Spinner's End
houyhnhnm102
celizwh at intergate.com
Thu Aug 10 01:28:07 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 156759
colebiancardi:
> Snape knew...Snape knew because Harry used Sectumsempra
> on Draco -Snape created that hex. Snape knew because Harry
> was a Potion's genuis, something that Harry never was while
> Snape taught the class.
houyhnhnm:
Snape did not reveal that he had created the Sectumsempra
curse during the scene in the bathroom. That scene can
be read with the assumption that Snape is only suspicious
of Harry being up to something (and Snape is always
suspicious that Harry is up to something). There is
nothing in the chapter to contradict such a reading.
colebiancardi:
> Snape knew his old Potions book fell into Harry's hands -
> he knew it because he saw it in Harry's mind.
houyhnhnm:
He saw *a* potions book in Harry's mind. He could recognize
it as his own or he could simply want to see the book because
he supects Harry of being up to something, knows Harry cannot
do Occlumency, and therefore knows the thought coming to the
forefront of Harry's mind is connected with the use of a Dark
curse. There is no hard evidence in that chapter to tell us
which it is.
colebiancardi:
> When Harry tried the Levicorpus spell, non verbally, Snape
> knew. That is when he revealed to Harry that he was the
> Half-Blood Prince.
houyhnhnm:
Only if the man on the lawn really *is* Snape. There is
nothing, I mean nothing, else in the book that *proves*
Snape is the HBP except the statement of the man on the
lawn. The only other canon connection between Snape and
Levicorpus is the fact that it was used *on* him. And
how do we know for sure that it really was Snape on the
lawn? Because he said he was the HBP. That's what I mean
by a circular argument.
colebiancardi:
> Snape knew way too much about the spells and the book.
> He only could have known all those things if he was the
> author, the owner, the Half Blood Prince.
houyhnhnm:
Or because he is the DADA professor, a former Death Eater,
used the Libatius Borage book when he was a student, and
had Levicorpus used on him.
colebiancardi:
> And with his mother's maiden name being Prince, the pieces
> of the puzzle fall neating into place.
houyhnhnm:
We don't even know that for sure, only that a woman named
Eileen Prince married a man named Snape and they had a child.
If the name of the child had been mentioned or even the date
of the birth announcement had been given I would feel more
secure that I was not being led down the garden path.
I'm not sure that the "Snape" was a polyjuiced impostor.
I can't begin to imagine who it would be, if not Snape.
I'm only saying that there is no evidence in the entire
book of Snape being the HBP except the statement in "Flight
of the Prince" and there is no proof that it really is
Snape on the lawn and that makes me suspicious.
Somebody, show me one piece of evidence that doesn't
involve conjecture, insinuation, sleight of hand, or
leaping to a conclusion.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive