Killing is not necessarily murder and to defeat is not the same thing as to
Steve
bboyminn at yahoo.com
Sun Aug 20 18:35:05 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 157187
--"Bruce Alan Wilson" <bawilson at ...> wrote:
>
> --- Lady Lawyer <mouthpiece49@> wrote:
> <snip>
> > by the way I don't think that killing someone in
> > pitched equal battle is the kind of "murder" that
> > will split your soul. I think the soul splitting
> > murder has to be with extreme cruelty. Else every
> > soldier would have a split soul.
> <snip>
>
> Cassy:
> > Well, there's this nice thing called "Vietnam
> > syndrom" .... I think that qualifies as split soul
> > in a certain way.
>
> BAW:
>
> ...
>
> JKR says that to create a horcrux one must commit a
> murder, but not all killing is murder!
>
> My legal dictionary defines murder as the unlawful
> killing of a human being with malice aforethought.
> Not all killing is murder.
> ...
>
> Also, note that part of the definition of murder is
> the killing of a HUMAN BEING. It might be argued that
> Voldemort is no longer human.
>
> Hence, even if Harry ends up killing Voldemort, he
> won't necessarily be lost; ...
bboyminn:
I'm going to have to side with what I think Cassey is
saying here.
We are dealing with the Soul, not the law. Keep in mind
that which is immoral does not have to be illegal, and
that which is illegal doesn't have to be immoral.
When we speak of Law, we are speaking of what society
will tolerate. We will not tolerate the killing of each
other, mostly because we ourselves do not want to be
killed.
Killing in a war, in the heat of combat, is not legal
murder, but war in and of itself is an offense to the
soul and a failing of mankind. I guess we could call
it a necessary evil. When called upon by circumstances,
men must do what men must do.
I think any kind of harm to a fellow human being harms
the soul, though doesn't necessarily full tear it. So,
as seems reasonable from that position, I believe that
harm occurs in degrees and that it can be healed.
I'm reminded of many World War II (WWII) veterans who
came home from a horrible war having done horrible things
that offended the soul, and they stoically went about
their lives never burdening their loved one with the
horrors they experienced. My own father stormed the
beaches of France with the Allies in WWII.
Yet, when I watch WWII documentaries, now these many
many many years later, these veterans are move to tears
while recounting their experience. Clearly, that experience
has touched their souls, but while some scars may remain,
I believe these basically good and decent men have healed
those soulful wounds.
Now to the story at hand, if Voldemort were a good and
decent person who truly regretted and repented the
mistakes of his past, and more importantly if he has keep
his soul all together, then he would have had a chance at
some soulful healing.
But he didn't, he externally stored pieces of his soul,
piece that can never heal. To use a physical metaphor, if
you cut off your finger and place it in a jar, you can never
expect finger and hand to join together in healing when they
are kept apart. Further, he stored pieces of his soul to gain
power and defeat the natural order of death. More so, he is
wholly unrepentant of his past acts and continues those
horendous acts in the present and plans more in the future.
A torn off piece of soul can never be heal if the person
does not engage in a healing process. If he continues to do
harm to others, then he continues to harm himself.
Metaphorically, he keeps picking at the scab.
Now to Harry; I really really hope JKR finds some why to
move the story so Harry doesn't have to flatly and coldly
kill Voldemort even though Voldemort thoroughly deserves
it. If Harry pulls Voldemort through the Veil, I wouldn't
consider that murder. I would say that it would damage
Harry's soul to some unknown extent, but not to the extent
of cold-blooded, heartless, compassionless, calculated
murder.
If Harry can find a way to rob Voldemort of his power, so
much the better. Harry suffers minor harm to his soul and
his emotions, and Voldemort is not only defeated by
humiliated; the greatest wizard in the world, now a mere
muggle.
So, I hope JKR can find a way for Harry to defeat Voldemort
in a not so cold-blooded way, and if that is the only way,
then I at least hope she shows us that later in life Harry
experiences some healing from the experience.
JKR isn't crystal clear on this whole teat the soul thing,
so the best we can do is guess. I say souls can be healed,
but keeping a part of your soul away from the rest pretty
much guarantees that no healing can occur.
Just a few thoughts.
Steve/bboyminn
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive