Freedom for House-Elves (Was: Kreacher the Plot Device Elf)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 1 01:59:31 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 162213
> Pippin:
> Oh, I don't think it's an accident that Dobby and Grawp, who
> are unattractive, hard to like and difficult to understand (Snape!)
> have unexpectedly proven themselves to be just as useful and
> loyal to Harry as those we'd prefer to read about. JKR did
something
> a bit risky. It would have been much more typical of a popular
> entertainment if those noble and attractive centaurs had come to
their
> senses and rescued Harry from a crude and brutal Giant. If JKR was
> only interested in entertaining the readers , that's what she'd
have
> written, IMO. But she wants us to *think*, IMO, and clearly one of
> the things she wants us to think about is the fact that our
sympathies
> often lead us astray.
>
> I share your opinion of Dobby and Grawp. I'm not intrigued by their
> past or concerned about their future. And yet it's because the
wizards
> can't bring themselves to care about Elves or Giants that
Voldemort has
> been able to recruit them to his service, or so Dumbledore
believed.
Alla:
Hmmmm. I had been thinking about the reasons why I dislike house
elves ( not even dislike, but terribly annoyed with all of them).
Oh, and by the way I really really don't dislike Giants - I
absolutely respect them ( don't care for them much), but totally
respect as alien race, which is different, but we cannot be the
same, right?
So, I read Carol's post and while I found her description of Dobby
hilarious, I am not sure that I agree that he is portrayed as
caricature. I read Steve's post, it did not answer my question
either.
I mean, sure it is hard to understand emotional reaction I am
having,I mean not hard about Kreacher, but hard enough for me to
undestand why I feel that way about Dobby.
And now finally your post comes along. Hehe. I had been awaiting
something like that, but not quite.
If I understand you correctly, the gist of what you said is that
most unsympathetic being deserves respect, deserves freedom and most
unsympathetic being may prove to be your most reliable ally.
Fair enough, as long as we are talking about Kreacher. I am
intelligent enough to figure out that it is quite likely the lesson
JKR wants me to learn with him, that no matter how I hate him, he
still deserves to be free. Agreed, understood, etc. As I said, no
matter how I feel about him, I understand or I think I understand (
I maybe totally wrong) authoritarial intent behind all that.
But we are not talking about Kreacher here, no?
We are talking about Dobby and nowhere in the books did I get the
impression that Dobby is meant to be portrayed as unsympathetic,
quite the contrary.
So, what is that about our sympathies leading us astray? I mentioned
before by the way, that so far my sympathies did not deceive me yet,
we shall see what happens in book 7 of course.
Grawp - sure, don't care for him at all, don't mind him dropping
dead, but I don't hate him, so I am not sure whether that can be
considered pulling the rug either - as in we thought he was evil and
he was not.
I think your analogy with Snape really falls flat ( to me of course)
Dobby and Grawp are annoying to me, but never ever I regarded them
as evil, while Snape I surely do.
Oh, and centaurs? Noble? Blinks. I like centaurs, I absolutely do,
but I am not sure I remember them being noble too often, so I am not
sure if contrast works either.
Alla, still trying to figure out why she finds Dobby annoying,
because his speech patterns do not bother her that much.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive