DD's sacrifice 9was Re: DDM!Harry and Snape/Grey!Snape
potioncat
willsonkmom at msn.com
Tue Dec 19 00:49:15 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 162913
Ffred wrote,
> Surely it was not Harry for whom Dumbledore gave his life, it was
Draco: Harry's invisible and immobilised and thereby not at risk. But
Dumbledore was prepared to die, not for one of the good guys, the
prophecy boy who he hopes will finally deal with Voldemort, but for
the "worst" child of all, the one who had always espoused Voldemort's
ideas, who had actively plotted to kill him.
>
> Something which I found to be a very powerful message.
Potioncat:
And I agree.
JKR said (either just before or just after HBP came out) that
Dumbledore is no Jesus. No, he isn't. But she most certainly
rewrote "the two thieves" on the cross scene. Here's DD about to be
killed, being mocked by the Death Eaters. Here's Draco, afraid of
death (for himself and his parents), being told he's dependent on a
condemned-DD's mercy.
Snape runs in---and whether he's Judas-the-good or Judas-the-betrayer-
--it appears DD asks him to do something. Yet I don't think he was
asking Snape to kill him or to save him, but to save Draco.
Up until this point, I thought Draco was a toe-rag. (A word I learned
in this series) and I would have shed no tears for him. Then DD goes
and sacrifices his life for Draco--Darn it--and made me re-think it
all.
Or, I should say it differently? JKR warned girls to avoid the bad
guys Draco/Snape(?) and choose good men. She indicated Draco was bad,
bad, bad. Nothing more to say. (At least that was what I understood.)
Then she sacrifices Dumbledore for Draco.
A very powerful message.
(Yes, Harry was there too, and at risk. But I think it was important
to DD that Draco not only chose to not kill him, but did not get
forced into killing him.)
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive