Dumbledore's nonintervention at the Dursleys, was Re: Bad Writing? (was: JKR and the boys)

[lupinlore]

No: HPFGUIDX 163038

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Bruce Alan Wilson" 
<bawilson at ...> wrote:
>
> 
> We don't know what was in DD's letter, but if there was a non-
interference
> clause, it would explain a lot.  The WW considers breaking 
contracts and vows to
> be a very serious thing.  
> 
 
Yes, if there were such it would be very helpful as far as 
explanations go.  Unfortunately, as of now we are completely in the 
dark as to that.  And, barring revelations from Portrait!Dumbledore, 
I don't know how we would find out.  It isn't as if Petunia is 
forthcoming with these kinds of things.

Of course Ron and Hermione will be on hand to provoke things, so 
something might come out in anger.  I suppose DD might have left a 
will or a pensieve moment, as well.  


Lupinlore