Spilled Potion (WAS Broken potionvial etc. etc.etc.)
Neri
nkafkafi at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 29 17:09:30 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 163264
>
> Dan:
>
> Now, all this arguing over spilled potion is quite the point Rowling
> was making - the point is neither that Snape sabotaged the potion,
> nor Harry flicked it accidentally, how can it be? We aren't told,
and
> there's no key given to "solve" what happened (the so-called
truth) -
> but people will take pointed sides based on the what IS known - THAT
> Snape gloated, THAT Harry fumed. This is, of course, the point - but
> to try to extrapolate some ideal "what happened" from emotional
> reactions is not only silly, it's damn dangerous.
>
Neri:
Unfortunately, this approach misses completely the question both
Potioncat (if I understood correctly) and myself were interested
with: why does a mystery writer excelling in red herrings seems to
sincerely believe that some things in her books are self-evident,
even when they are only hinted at in the books.
So if JKR left certain important aspects of Snape (for example), such
as his motivations and loyalties, as official mysteries, then by the
above slippery slope argument we can know *nothing else* about him,
unless it was canonically specified as fact, and even then it's
subject to Snape acting, Harry's filter, future potential revelations
and so on. Moreover, there can't even be a discussion regarding the
impression that the author intended to create (as opposed to what
actually happened) because whenever some canon isn't absolutely
unequivocal (which they almost never are) it means the author must
have intended to make the point that no point can't be made.
When a fan says to JKR "Apart from Harry, Snape is my favourite
character because he is so complex and I just love him", according to
your argument JKR should take this as a great complement because this
is exactly the effect she intended, making Snape complex and
ambiguous. And yet JKR answers "Why do you love him? Why do people
love Snape? I do not understand this." She seems to be genuinely
baffled, but according to your argument she must be lying through her
teeth when she says things like that.
Neri
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive