Why did not Voldemort Imperiod everyone? WAS: Re: Unbreakable Vow
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Fri Feb 24 21:19:11 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 148744
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Michelle"
<mmmwintersteiger at ...> wrote:
>
> > Exodusts:
> > PS A more amusing question to ask is why, since we know from
> > Viktor Krum (in GoF) that Imperiused-persons can themselves cast
> > Unforgivable Curses, Voldemort doesn't just take over the world
> > using an army of daisy-chained Imperius victims?
michelle:
> While there is nothing in the canon to support this theory, I would
> think that the reason LV hasn't Imperized (correct spelling?)
massive
> amounts of people would be that they would be too hard to control.
It
> seems like you would have to do the curse individually therefore
> making each person a "puppet" if you will. How many puppets can
one
> wizard handle, well I'm sure its not many more than the master Jim
> Henson :)
Geoff:
I wonder whether anyone on the group can give a post number because
this idea was floated about a year or so ago and was discussed at
some length.
I didn't join in the replies so I can't offer a message source
because I haven't got one in my own personal message archive.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive