Real child abuse/ Kantian typo

[ellecain]

No: HPFGUIDX 146133

 
> > Betsy Hp:
> > I'm really uncomfortable with that sort of philosophy.  Rather 
than 
> > using rules fairly applied to everybody, some rules are made for 
> > one sort of person and other rules are made for another sort.  
So, 
> > Draco deserves to be physically tortured because of who he is.  
But 
> > Neville should never be challanged because of who he is.  Hagrid 
is 
> > allowed to physically endanger his students.  Snape is not 
allowed 
> > to emotionally endanger his.
> 

Nora:
> Someone posted something not long ago in response to this 
statement 
> or one like it bringing up Kant, but I think they typoed/got it 
off 
> incomplete, so the search doesn't find it.  (Chocolate to anyone 
who 
> finds it for me, because I like to cite things?)  

Elyse: Erm... I guess that would be me. I wrote a response 
where it was supposed to be Kantian but I left out the K by mistake.
Aaargh....I tried so hard to eliminate my post of all typos but
there must be a jinx on my fingers.

The only reason I brought up Kant was because of a comment on HPfGU
Fantastic Posts that goes "Kant is arguably the Snapiest philosopher"
,one that I could never comprehend. Can anyone accept my challenge 
to prove to me that Snape's thinking goes along the lines of Kantian 
philosophy? <eg>

The link to my post is here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/145870
if anyone wants to read it. (I cant believe someone read it and 
remembered it not to mention decoding the typos)

Elyse, eating Nora's chocolate...