Parallels in Prophecy (long)
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Mon Jan 16 15:15:53 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 146544
In the six months which have passed since the unveiling of HBP, a
huge amount of time and bandwidth has been expended on certain
threads which seem to dominate the thinking of group members, in
particular Snape and the Horcruxes. This has been true in the past
with other topics and "that" prophecy has frequently occupied the
headline position.
My mind has been brought back to it because of the brief exchanges I
have had recently regarding the prophecies in Shakespeare's "Macbeth"
and I have been pondering over other prophecies which come to mind.
Even in the real world, this is an area which lays itself open to
varied interpretations and misinterpretations. By way of example, the
Oracle at Delphi in ancient times was renowned for its obfuscatory
messages.
In group discussions which involve other books, the most commonly
occurring comparisons are with LOTR and the Narnia books and both of
these, as well as Macbeth, have prophecies in places. Perhaps the
easiest are those on C.S.Lewis' books. In "The Lion, the Witch and
the Wardrobe", two are quoted.
Mr.Beaver tells the children:
"For that's another of the old rhymes:
When Adam's flesh and Adam's bone
Sits at Cair Paravel in throne,
The evil time will be over and done"
Shortly afterwards, he continues:
"She (the White Witch) has been watching for you this many a year and
if she knew there were four of you she'd be more dangerous still."
"What's that to do with it?" asked Peter.
"Because of another prophecy," said Mr.Beaver. "Down at Cair Paravel
that's the castle on the sea coast down at the mouth of this river
which ought to be the capital if all was as it should be down at
Cair Paravel there are four thrones and it's a saying in Narnia time
out of mind that when two Sons of Adam and two Daughters of Adam sit
in those four thrones, then it will be the end not only of the White
Witch's reign but of her life..."
These are very straightforward prophecies and would seem to be too
obvious for wrong readings to be made; in passing, the second has
interesting echoes of Harry Potter to me.
Considering Macbeth, the meetings with the witches produce messages
which differ in that they are a mixture of fact and foretelling. When
they first greet Macbeth, they hail him as Thane of Glamis, Thane of
Cawdor and as a future king. The first he knows for fact but, within
minutes, he is greeted with the news that the second title is now his
because of its previous holder's treason. He is intrigued by the
thought of kingship and when he tells Lady Macbeth, she sets about
converting it into a self-fulfilling prophecy by arranging the murder
of King Duncan. Scotland is thrown into turmoil by the tyrannical
rule which follows which leads Macbeth to his second encounter with
the Weird Sisters. Again, the advice is split into a warning and two
prophecies. First, beware Macduff, the Thane of Fife. Then the two
messages we have been discussing:
"Be bloody, bold and resolute:
Laugh to scorn
The power of man: for none of woman born
Shall harm Macbeth"
And
"Macbeth shall never vanquish'd be, until
Great Birnam Wood, to high Dunsinane Hill
Shall come against him."
Finally, we have an interesting parallel in "The Return of the King".
The Lord of the Nazgûl is confronted in front of the fallen King
Théoden:
"Begone, foul dwimmerlaik, lord of carrion! Leave the dead in peace!"
A cold voice answered: "Come not between the Nazgûl and his prey!
.."
"A sword rang as it was drawn. "Do what you will; but I will hinder
it if I may."
"Hinder me? Thou fool. No living man may hinder me!"
Then Merry heard of all sounds in that hour the strangest. It seemed
that Dernhelm laughed and the clear voice was like the ring of
steel. "But no living man am I! You look upon a woman. Éowyn I am,
Éomund's daughter. You stand between me and my lord and kin. Begone,
if you be not deathless! For living or dark undead, I will smite you
if you touch him."
The winged creature screamed at her but the Ringwraith made no answer
and was silent as if in sudden doubt.
The interesting thought which comes to me is, where does prophecy
originate? In the examples above, we have foretelling from two
different directions. The prophecies given to Macbeth are planned to
subvert "brave Macbeth" and to bring him down to destruction; they
are evil in intent. Conversely, that in Lewis' story is prophecy on
the side of good, telling of the fall of the White Witch and the
restoration of Narnia. Likewise, the prophecy regarding the Lord of
the Nazgûl also can be seen as a good one. Similar in its idea to
Macbeth, it has obviously been taken at face value by the Ringwraith,
taking "man" in a generic sense and failing, as Macbeth did, to see
an alternative interpretation.
Now to Harry Potter. Do we consider the prophecy to be a good one or
a bad one? Initially, I suppose good because it talks about the Dark
Lord being vanquished. Again, rather like the Macbeth scenario,
Voldemort makes it a self-fulfilling prophecy by taking action to
negate it; he decides that Harry is the "one" meant and attacks him.
Reminiscent of Macbeth and King Duncan.
Jo Rowling makes no secret of the fact that she likes Macbeth. In the
Leaky Cauldron/Mugglenet interview on 16th July 2005, she said this:
"JKR:
.Harry's a threat. They must meet each other.
ES: I remember thinking when I read "Order of the Phoenix," what
would happen if Harry and Voldemort just decided to
JKR: Shake hands, and walk away? We'll agree to disagree!
[Laughter.]
ES: What if he never heard the prophecy?
JKR: And that's it, isn't it. As I said, that's what I posted on my
site -
ES: I'm glad you put that up.
JKR: It's the "Macbeth" idea. I absolutely adore "Macbeth." It is
possibly my favourite Shakespeare play. And that's the question isn't
it? If Macbeth hadn't met the witches, would he have killed Duncan?
Would any of it have happened? Is it fated or did he make it happen?
I believe he made it happen."
Voldermort, by foloowing a similar line of thinking, has kicked the
ball into touch and made things happen. But the question remains, how
do we interpret the prophecy? We have seen that, in the case of
Shakespeare and Tolkien, the prophecies worked out in a way that
their recipients least expected. Foretelling which seemed to favour
them was suddenly revealed to have a sting in its tail.
It is interesting in the LOTR narrative at the Pelennor Fields that
Éowyn is able to overcome the Witch-King because, she is not a man,
and she is also helped by Merry, who also is not a man but a hobbit.
In the final encounter, the chief Ringwraith is unbodied. But there
is no stigma attached to her in the killing of this evil being. It is
a pivotal point in the great victory which the Men of the West
achieved against Sauron.
Can we draw any conclusions for Book 7. Possibly a dozen conflicting
resolutions to the battle! Since Jo Rowling is fan of Macbeth and
read Tolkien when she was about twenty and enjoyed it, we can see
that there are echoes of what enthused her in her use of prophecy etc.
Voldermort has perhaps been lulled into thinking that the prophecy
favours him; is he, like the Ringwraith and Macbeth, due for a nasty
shock? Can Harry dispose of him by unbodying him again perhaps with
the help of others such as Ron and Hermione acting in concert as
Merry did? Can he also, as Éowyn did, defeat Voldemort and still feel
no guilt attached?
Éowyn's cry: "Begone, if thou be not deathless" still chimes with me.
Voldemort prides himself that he had:
"gone further than anybody along the path that leads to immortality."
(GOF "The Death Eaters" p.566 UK edition)
but, like the Lord of the Nazgûl, he hasn't yet reached that point...
I take a measure of ease in that, both in the Macbeth and LOTR
prophecies, good triumphed in the end; I am still a member of the
Harry will Live group and am optimistic that we will prevail. I
believe that, in the end, JKR will pull off something which will
surprise Voldemort, Harry, the Wizarding World and, last but not
least, us...
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive