Snape ignoring HP blood (was: CHAPDISC: HBP8)

dumbledore11214 dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 18 03:43:13 UTC 2006


No: HPFGUIDX 146637

Shaun:
<HUGE SNIP>
> They would have only done so if they were confident a student 
didn't 
> need medical care. If they suspected a reasonable chance that they 
> did, then they wouldn't have ignored it (and if they did, they'd 
have 
> been seriously failing in a teachers duty of care). But if they 
were 
> confident that the student was unlikely to need medical care, then 
> it's very possible they'd have ignored such injuries?


Alla:

I snipped a lot, because that is my main point - I don't think that 
Snape CAN be confident that Harry does not need medical care at all. 
IMO of course. He does not just have a tricle of blood on his face, 
his whole face is bloodied. I think Snape should have checked, but 
of 
course he is Snape. It is just I cannot help but be amazed every 
time 
I see the new evidence of his cruelty.(IMO of course) I am just 
wondering how far he can go. I stated in my previous post that I 
believe that as of right now Snape does not want Harry dead ( and I 
do 
NOT think that he has altruistic reasons of course. But I obviously 
just speculating here), but in my speculative opinion if Harry 
experiences any kind of suffering less than death(or something that 
can lead to death as Crucio), be it physical or emotional, Snape 
will 
not do anything.


Shaun:
> Harry isn't a little boy - he's a capable sixteen year old. 
> 
> If he needs medical attention, he's capable of asking for it. 

Alla:

I speculate that Harry would not ask Snape for medical attention 
even 
if he will be close to death as things stand right now. I don't 
think 
that it excuses Snape not asking though.

Just my opinion obviously,

Alla










More information about the HPforGrownups archive