Snape ignoring HP blood (was: CHAPDISC: HBP8)
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 18 03:43:13 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 146637
Shaun:
<HUGE SNIP>
> They would have only done so if they were confident a student
didn't
> need medical care. If they suspected a reasonable chance that they
> did, then they wouldn't have ignored it (and if they did, they'd
have
> been seriously failing in a teachers duty of care). But if they
were
> confident that the student was unlikely to need medical care, then
> it's very possible they'd have ignored such injuries?
Alla:
I snipped a lot, because that is my main point - I don't think that
Snape CAN be confident that Harry does not need medical care at all.
IMO of course. He does not just have a tricle of blood on his face,
his whole face is bloodied. I think Snape should have checked, but
of
course he is Snape. It is just I cannot help but be amazed every
time
I see the new evidence of his cruelty.(IMO of course) I am just
wondering how far he can go. I stated in my previous post that I
believe that as of right now Snape does not want Harry dead ( and I
do
NOT think that he has altruistic reasons of course. But I obviously
just speculating here), but in my speculative opinion if Harry
experiences any kind of suffering less than death(or something that
can lead to death as Crucio), be it physical or emotional, Snape
will
not do anything.
Shaun:
> Harry isn't a little boy - he's a capable sixteen year old.
>
> If he needs medical attention, he's capable of asking for it.
Alla:
I speculate that Harry would not ask Snape for medical attention
even
if he will be close to death as things stand right now. I don't
think
that it excuses Snape not asking though.
Just my opinion obviously,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive