Remus, Sirius and Harry's desires for revenge WAS: Re: Spies, Lies and self-ful
spotsgal
Nanagose at aol.com
Fri Jan 20 16:59:25 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 146758
> > Pippin,
> > regarding Lupin's and Sirius's plan to kill Peter in the
> > Shrieking Shack:
> > Lupin was about to betray everything his closest friends
> > believed in, everything for which they had fought, suffered and
> > died. It's a poor way to honor their sacrifice.
<snipping mine and Debbie's comments about Sirius and Harry acting
similarly to Lupin>
> Alla:
>
> Right, new day started here, so I can post this comment. :-)
> I just wanted to interject briefly, that I am not concerned with
> Sirius desire for revenge, Lupin's desire for revenge or Harry's
> desire for revenge.
>
> In fact, I would find it VERY strange if they reacted ANY
> differently to the abov described situations.
Christina:
Well, yeah, that's essentially what I was saying. If we're going to
make a big deal out of Lupin's desire for revenge (and assumed
willingness to follow through with it), we'd better also take issue
with the same qualities in Harry. We obviously don't, so it
shouldn't be an issue at all.
> Alla:
> ...I actually never considered that Remus might be just in as much
> shock as Sirius was...But the way Remus talks to Sirius also shows
> IMO person in shock and maybe he was never able to properly deal
> with what happened with Potters either.
Christina:
Remus is a bit emotionally repressed to begin with, and the subject
of the Potters' death still affects him, if his odd reactions to
Harry bringing up the subject are any indication. I do think that
he has had social contact since the Potters died. Unless the
labelled professor's case was some kind of joke gift from the other
Marauders (which would actually be sort of cute), he's had a job or
two. However, I agree that he probably hasn't come to terms with or
spoken much about what happened, for a few reasons. The first is
that I think Remus spent a lot of time in the Muggle world after
that Halloween. The second is that he's the type to keep his
emotions on the inside in the first place. Third, the Potters'
death is an event that is connected to emotions of happiness for
most people (it ended Voldemort's reign of terror), so it would be
hard for him to find people that could really understand what he was
going through.
Now, while it has been a long time since the Potters died, Remus is
only finding out their true killer *now*. That must have been
difficult, considering the fact that Remus must have mourned Peter
as a hero for many years. So the element of surprise is surely a
factor in Remus's actions, the same way they are in Harry's. Even
Sirius, who has known about Peter's betrayal for years (and has
probably relived memories of it in Azkaban), is shaking with emotion
when the time comes to kill Peter. It's a high-stress situation.
> Alla:
> And of course I am not concerned at all with Harry's desire for
> revenge. All of his running out and trying to cast Unforgivables
> happens right AFTER he witnessed murders of the two adults dearest
> to him....<snip> Harry does NOT have a benefit of time to work
> through his feelings yet, when he goes after the killers.
Christina:
Well, not exactly. I mean, he finds out that Sirius supposedly
betrayed his parents during the wintertime and sees the man at the
end of the schoolyear. That's quite a bit of time to sit with the
information. If I came face-to-face with a crazed mass murderer who
is bigger and stronger than I, I don't care who he killed, my first
instinct would be to RUN! So there's an example of Harry acting
after time has passed, although, like you said, I don't find it that
big of an issue. I don't think Harry is sadistic or cruel (that's
why the Crucio's don't work), but he can be a tad impetuous, and
that's all that I fault him for in these instances. If he wants to
defeat Voldemort, he needs to reign in his anger and learn to reason
under pressure with a clear head.
> Alla:
> What Remus and Sirius wanted to do of course should not
> have happened, and it did not, but the desire for revenge was IMO
> perfectly understandable and does not make any of them evil.
> Human - yes. Evil - I doubt it very much.
Christina:
Exactly. Not to mention the fact that supposed "revenge" can be
seen as justice, and probably is seen that way by a few of the
characters we're talking about. Peter kills (essentially), so Peter
is killed. Bellatrix kills, so Bellatrix is killed. It's still
wrong for Harry & Co. to take matters into their own hands, but in a
world where the government is corrupt and useless, I don't find it
particularly shocking that they want to.
Christina
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive