From the future -- Re: Hermione dead and MAJOR SPOILER to "The Sixth Sense" mov
lucianam73
lucianam73 at yahoo.com.br
Sun Jan 29 10:41:51 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 147231
> <jacques_poggio wrote:
> >
http://www.jkrowling.com/textonly/en/rumours_view.cfm?id=31
>
> "I've also heard a whisper about Ron and Hermione's son
> time-travelling, so I shall go further and tell you that NONE of
> the characters in the books has returned from the future."
>
> So yes, it IS cannon. At least that nobody is from the future.
> However, since we would have noticed Hermione dissapearing in the
past...
>
> Well, you get the point. But it was well thought out.
>
> -Neuman
>
lucianam:
If what happened was (or will be, since Book 7 hasn't been released
yet - getting all the verbs right is a bore!) Book 7 Hermione
travelling back to Book 5, there is no contradiction of canon whatsoever.
It's the same situation in PoA. Harry and Hermione travelled back in
time (3 hours), so it doesn't contradict that quotation either.
And yet, if you look at both these situations from the POV of the
characters in Book 5' timeframe, B7 Hermione is a 'character returned
from the future'; and from the POV of the characters in PoA living in
the timeframe three hours prior to H&H's Time-Travel, Harry and
Hermione from '3 hours later' are also 'characters returned from the
future'.
So you see, there were two chracters who have returned from the future
in PoA, if you look at it from a certain POV. If you take JKR's
quotation literally, well, then she has contradicted herself.
I don't see any difference between these two Time-Travel, canon-wise.
Only one of them goes back 3 hours, the other one goes back 2 years.
Lucianam
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive