Re: Lord Voldemort's Six Horcruxes? Are Dumbledores Opinions Wrong? (LVs SHADOW
jekatiska
mauranen at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 30 10:15:28 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 147282
> Brothergib wrote:
> > > Interesting, but Voldemort is not snakelike when he reemerges
> from
> > > his long 'exile' when he conversed with 'the very worst of our
> kind'.
<snip>
> Carol:
> *(snip)*
> > I think he must have been snakelike (as the result of Nagini as
> > Horcrux) before Godric's Hollow for two reasons. First, the DEs
in
> the
> > graveyard scene don't react at all to his appearance. This is
> > Voldemort restored, Voldemort as they knew him. And second, the
face
> > that appears out of Quirrell's head in SS/PS is snakelike. At
that
> > point, Quirrell is drinking unicorn blood to sustain his master,
but
> > snake venom only comes into the picture when its used to create
his
> > fetal body and provide "milk" for baby!mort.
>
> Ceridwen:
> I think that, as LV split his soul and removed the pieces, he
became
> a bit less human each time. He was born with one quality of
snakes:
> Parseltongue. So as he becomes less human, he becomes more
> snakelike. I think that, if he became an Animagus, he would
become a
> snake; and his Patronus is probably a snake (or a basilisk or
other
> serpentine creature), IMO. Snakelike properties might even be a
> Slytherin family trait.
>
<snip>
I agree with Ceridwen: it's not the horcrux that makes him
snakelike, but his inborn snakelike qualities. I would also suggest
that having possessed the bodies of *snakes* for years, not having
his own, must have left some marks on him.
Jekatiska
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive