[HPforGrownups] Re: open letter to JKR
rebecca
dontask2much at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 19 21:36:30 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 155657
> Susan McGee said:
> Oh, goodness, but fiction, movies are a very powerful way of working
> on our imagination. If they are good literature, good films (meaning
> extremely high quality that cause us to suspend disbelief) then they
> have REMENDOUS power to change attitudes because they work on the part
> of us that is feeling not thinking.....There are a ton of examples,
> most recently the DaVinci Code, but books like Gulliver's Travels,
> Gone with the Wind, Stranger in a Strange Land..(I'll make a list if
> anyone is interested).....
Rebecca now:
Fiction and movies can work on some individuals and highlight social issues
or present an argument, but the real tools of change typically come from
outside these venues - the only books that have ever radically changed
anything in societies were books like the Bible, the Torah, and the Koran.
For example, Gone With The Wind (which happens to be one of my favorite
books) didn't really highlight the plight of slaves during the Civil War,
Uncle Tom's Cabin presented that much more effectively if you ask me. The
DaVinci Code *is* fiction, and many of the "facts" Dan Brown put forth on
his website about it and in interviews are not entirely correct. (And no, I
do not subscribe to a particular faith and base my opinion about the book in
a very open frame of mind. Even scholarly Elaine Pagels, one of Brown's
supporters, acknowledges that.) While I personally get the message of
Stranger in a Strange Land, I think it is poorly written and fault Heinlein
for his inability to make the reader get emotionally and psychologically
involved with the world and characters he created. If an author can't do
that, then to me he/she has failed to convey the message properly.
You cited Gulliver's Travels - where you aware that it was edited by the
publisher because some sections were too overtly inflammatory for the Whig
controlled Parliament at the time? Like Swift's publisher, I believe that
sometimes *less* detail is far more compelling in this regard. JKR, like
other authors before her (CS Lewis, Tolkien, and Pullman) writing epics or
coming-of-age fiction, has used allegory effectively to make her views
known. Equating bigotry with class or blood prejudice in a fictional world
to me is far more effective in swaying reader's opinions or start them
thinking on topics such as equality for all rather than depicting a
controversial (like it or not, such a thing probably would be so to some
people) specific set of real-life people in the series.
Rebecca
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive