Whose side are we on?? :was: Arthur right or not?

[pippin_999]

No: HPFGUIDX 156075

Lupinlore:
> Oh, certainly the WW seems backward in a lot of ways. But for none of
> the adults to even *acknowledge* what happened to Harry?  That's...
> well, for a lack of a better word, contemptible.  You say the WW
> deplores Umbridge, but I certainly see no sign of them deploring what
> happened to Harry.  Even McGonnagall, who has special
> responsibilities in this instance, lets it go without so much as
> a "Sorry about that, Potter."  

Pippin:
IIRC,  McGonagall fed Harry two biscuits and told him that
defying Umbridge was going to cost him a lot more than House
Points and dententions. She warned him to keep his head down and
keep his temper.  What do you want her to do now, give him
another biscuit and say, "I told you so"? 

Pippin