Harry a Horcrux? No.. Something different...
Geoff Bannister
gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Sat Jun 3 06:45:34 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 153311
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Jazmyn Concolor <jazmyn at ...> wrote:
Jazmyn:
> I am wondering where people keep getting the idea that the simple act of
> using a killing spell creates a horcrux.. I find this HIGHLY unlikely
> that everyone who kills anyone is making horcruxes willy-nilly, right
> and left, popping them out of their ears or whatever. While the whole
> idea of soul splitting by killing is all very fun for some, its not
> likely that it just creates a random horcrux. If.. and I say IF,
> wizards killing splits the soul, then likely all the pieces stay
> together normally and the person just has to deal with it, with nothing
> more then whatever regrets they had caused by killing..
Geoff:
I agree with this. Way back in post 139859, in a long discussion on
whether Harry was or was not a Horcrux - and I have always argued
strongly in favour of the latter - I wrote the following:
<quote>
We are told that a Horcrux is created, "by an act of evil the
supreme act of evil. By committing murder. Killing rips the soul
apart. The wizard intent upon creating a Horcrux would use the damage
to his advantage: he would encase the torn portion-" [1]...
[1] HBP "Horcruxes" p.465 UK edition
</quote>
Please note that Slughorn does not say that horcruxes are randomly
created. They are created by an ACT OF EVIL. They do not just
"happen" - they are made by a specific act of will.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive