DD's Knowledge (was Re: Nice vs. Good, honesty,)
lupinlore
rdoliver30 at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 4 20:25:57 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 153367
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "pippin_999" <foxmoth at ...>
wrote:
>
<SNIP>
>
> Pippin:
> Well, Harry's problem, IMO, is that his parental instincts have
> been activated too soon, because he's basically had to parent
> himself. There's no way to undo that, as Dumbledore sadly
> discovered. But Harry doesn't have the experience or the mental
> development to parent wisely, so the series is, I would say,
> giving him the opportunity to develop these things and meanwhile
> showing how he suffers for the lack of them.
Okay. So we have the following scenario, I believe. At least, the
following chain of events and causation seems to match with this set
of ideas. I'm not arguing for or against this chain of causation or
the ideas you put forth, I'm just trying to see how this might play
out with regard to the events we know of:
1) DD leaves Harry with the Dursleys for whatever reason.
2) Harry shows up at Hogwarts. DD tries to make the best of it,
but is surprised/horrified/disturbed/guilt-stricken/whatever about
how all this has turned out.
3) DD knows he needs to tell Harry about the prophecy, but his
horror/guilt/whatever keeps derailing the process. Perhaps he even
discourages other people from speaking with Harry about the past,
not wanting the poor boy to be upset by his possible fate and not
wanting him to become depressed and brooding through thinking of
what he has lost. This would explain why McGonagall, Lupin,
Sirius, and even Snape are remarkably close to the vest with details
about Lily and James.
4) The events of PoA and GoF highlight the danger Harry is in but
also deepen DD's quandary, leading him to take steps to fix things
by instituting draconic measures to keep Harry safe and Sirius
alive. But it's too late and the damage from (1) can't be undone.
5) After OOTP, Dumbledore comes as close as he can, given his
temperment and the overall situation, to lashing out in
frustration. Basically, his confrontation with the Dursleys was as
close as he could come to saying "This is all YOUR fault and thank
you very much."
> I do think that Dumbledore might at least wonder whether
> Harry was bullying Draco. After all, Draco often seems to come out
> the worst in these encounters-- he wouldn't be trying to get
> himself beaten up, would he?
DD's attitude toward Draco is, I have to admit, even more of a
migraine-inducer than his attitude toward Harry. If he believes
Draco is being bullied and that Draco is a reasonably competent,
rational human being, then why on Earth does DD let Draco run around
committing attempted murder? If he thinks Draco is basically a
screw-up, that would explain why he isn't surprised that Draco keeps
getting the worst of things.** But it still doesn't explain why he
treats the matter of Draco's mission with such kid-gloves. After
all, if he thinks Draco is essentially incompetent then letting the
kid run around Hogwarts on a murder mission is like giving a chimp a
loaded gun and letting it run loose.
** Scene with staff over breakfast:
DD: I was reviewing the House Point awards. I see there was another
encounter between Mr. Potter and Mr. Malfoy yesterday.
>McG and SS look at each other cautiously<
DD: Let us do this the easy way. Minerva, where is Harry?
McG: In Gryffindor Tower.
DD: Severus, where is Mr. Malfoy?
SS: In the infirmary.
>DD facepalm<
Lupinlore
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive