Rereading SS/PS question(s)/Harry's protections
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 17 18:49:32 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 153983
> Pippin:
> This line of thought reminds me of the foolish villagers who
decided
> that since no one ever fell off the cliff it would be safe to take
the
> fence down. I think considering what happened to the Longbottoms,
> not to mention James and Lily themselves, it would only make sense
> for Dumbledore to take a belt and suspenders approach to keeping
> Harry safe.
Alla:
And if I may go back to my original question. What you just said is
perfectly understandable, but for the fact that Dumbledore's "belt
and suspenders approach" just does not seem to work very well, does
it?
I mean, if those folks are Order Members, then I have no case, it is
just I am incredibly puzzled of their way of keeping watch over
Harry - deliberately directing Harry's attention to them.
To me those folks seem to be doing what Steve suggested as his
second idea - thanking Harry, etc, basically doing celebrity
hunting. And if they do THAT, Dumbledore's security measures do not
seem to be worth a dime to me, since anybody can locate Harry,
anybody. IMO of course.
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive