Harry's arrogance /Evil Snape.

[eggplant107]

No: HPFGUIDX 154338

"justcarol67" <justcarol67 at ...> wrote:

> was it wrong to kill Dumbledore if that
> was the only way to get Harry off the
> tower? (Snape would have seen the second
> broom and deduced that Harry was there
> in his Invisibility Cloak.

We know that individually, with the exception of Snape, none of the
Death Eaters in the tower were a match for Harry, If Snape was on his
side (presumably Dumbledore would see what was happening and unfreeze
Harry, and after he got his wand back even join into the fight sick as
he was) then the two ( probably 3) of them  would have maid short work
of the Death Eaters; especially as they would have the element of
surprise, none would expect Snape to attack and they didn't even know
Harry was there. Even if you disagree with the above scenario at the
very least you must say that if Snape had chosen to fight the
situation would have been far from hopeless. Instead Snape chouse to
murder Dumbledore, that is why I think Snape is evil. But I could be
wrong, if you'd told me a year ago that there would still be debate in
Potter circles if Snape was good or evil I would have said you were
crazy. Shows you what I know. 

As to Harry's arrogance, well, it's not arrogance if it's true. In
book 6 Harry was wiser than anybody else, including Dumbledore. 

Eggplant