Of essence divided?

Geoff Bannister gbannister10 at tiscali.co.uk
Mon Jun 26 06:52:46 UTC 2006


No: HPFGUIDX 154339

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "distaiyi" <distaiyi at ...> wrote:
>
> I read the Occulemency chapter ( well reread it ) after my original post.
> 
> As JKR has said any number of times, she words things very
> carefully... In this case she chose the word essence.
> 
> 1 a : the permanent as contrasted with the accidental element of being 
>   b : the individual, real, or ultimate nature of a thing especially
> as opposed to its existence c : the properties or attributes by means
> of which something can be placed in its proper class or identified as
> being what it is
> 2 : something that exists : ENTITY
> 3 a (1) : a volatile substance or constituent (as of perfume) 
>     (2) : a constituent or derivative possessing the special qualities
> (as of a plant or drug) in concentrated form; also : a preparation of
> such an essence or a synthetic substitute b : ODOR, PERFUME
> 4 : one that possesses or exhibits a quality in abundance as if in
> concentrated form <she was the essence of punctuality>
> 
> Frankly I don't see how we can interpret this as anything but a
> question about the essence of Voldemorte or of Nagini. In either case
> I find the implication that he believes Nagini is a Horcrux to be
> stronger than the implication that he believes Nagini simply to be
> possessed.

Geoff:
Might I yet again drag up a thread from the archives....

Way back in the halcyon pre-HBP days, before Horcruxes, (sigh), I started 
a thread called "The Smoke Serpent".

This was message 79231 and some of the replies along the thread 
might be relevant to or of interest to the current line of thinking.








More information about the HPforGrownups archive