Being Good and Evil (was:Re: Harry's arrogance (was Evil Snape)
Peggy Richter
richter at ridgenet.net
Thu Jun 29 11:57:37 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 154568
Pippin wrote: In the Potterverse, facial disfigurement is associated
with Harry's scar, Mad-eye Moody's injuries, and Bill's mauling by
Fenrir, all inflicted by Death Eaters. Hermione is in bad company here.
PAR: I think that somewhere in all this the issue of free will, which
JKR said was important to her has been lost.
Dudly CHOSE to greedily eat HARRY's Birthday cake before Hagrid gave
him a pig's tail. (he chose to be a pig).
Dudly chose again to disregard his diet and eat the ton toffee. The
twins put the tempation in front of him but they didn't MAKE him eat
it.
Marietta CHOSE to betray the DA group. She could have told HHP that
she didn't feel they were doing the right thing and should quit, she
could have decided not to continue going. She agreed to abide by the
groups' rules and then didn't. Nor has she ever approached Hermione
to ask for help (theoretically she "forgot" based on an obliviate at
DD's office but I'm not sure it wasn't actually an imperious)-- and in
that she again CHOSE to continue helping Umbrige.
Compare to the child Imperio'd into attempting to kill his parents.
Or the DE's toying with the muggles. Or Cedric. or those hit by
the "giant" hurricane, the bridge falling, even those killed by
the "gas explosion" of PP's escape. These people did nothing to incur
the suffering or death they went thru. There is a difference. Draco
has CHOSEN to support the DEs.
And yes, the same action taken for different motivations DOES make a
difference. Unless of course one is truly arguing that a policeman
who kills a criminal in the line of duty is a murderer the same as a
person who kills another in a bank robbery would be. I don't think JKR
is going with a "reverse Machiavell" -- that the ends NEVER justify
the means. The world is not that black and white and neither is the
world JKR has created.
PAR.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive