Crouch Sr. (the abbreviated version) (and jr.)
zgirnius
zgirnius at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 30 20:41:52 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 154659
Bookish Rose:
> I don't see how any judge could sentance a screaming kid
> the same as Bellatrix, who was defiant throughout the trial, openly
> claiming alligence to Voldermort. I honestly believe that if Barty
> had been acquitted he could have realised if maybe not the moral
> implications then at the very least the legal repecutions of his
> behavoir.
zgirnius:
We do not know the details for sure, but it seems to have been an
open-and-shut case. Any sentence other than life in Azkaban would go
against the law as it has been presented to us in canon. The crime of
which he was found guilty was the use of an Unforgivable Curse
(Cruciatus), a crime for which the automatic sentence is life in
Azkaban, (unless, of course, it is done by Ministry employees who
have been granted an exemption, a circumstance which certainly did
not apply in his case).
Now, if he didn't actually cast a single Crucio during the Longbottom
attack, the judge might have had some wiggle room. But we have no
indication that was the case.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive