[HPforGrownups] Trusting Snape
P J
midnightowl6 at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 2 01:24:11 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 148995
Peggy Wilkins:
The above is an interesting way of putting it, I think.
PJ:
But It's exactly the way I see it. I can't imagine two such intelligent men
thinking that Dumbledore's death by Snape's hand could further Harry's goal
in any way.
First, Dumbledore hasn't taught Harry how to sense "where magic has been" or
how to tell a horcrux from an old shoe. There's so much left undone that
needed to be done that they've actually put the mission in more danger of
failing because Harry is very ill prepared. Yes Harry knows all about
Voldermort's backstory but that isn't going to destroy the horcruxes and I
honestly don't believe LV will waste much time going after Harry now that
his mentor is dead.
If Snape is caught by Aurors (or hiding from them) then he's of no use to
Harry even if he is DDM!. If Harry sees Snape and isn't given a detailed
reason (no more "because I said so") why Dumbledore trusted Snape and what
the big plan is before they meet, then either Harry or Snape could
themselves be killed dueling! End of ALL plans! Voldermort wins by
default.
If DDM!Snape is killed by Voldermort for butting in where he didn't belong
then again, that's the end of it.
So please, tell me again what Dumbledore gained by having DDM!Snape AK him
on the tower? I see no pros for a DDM!Snape to have done what he did but at
least ESE or OFH!Snape gains notoriety and respect from the DE's and
*possibly* a pat on the back from LV (once he's finished crucioing him
awhile for saving Draco of course)...
Dumbledore was needed, Snape wasn't. The wrong man died on that tower.
PJ
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive