Blood on DD face again WAS: Re: Is Snape good or evil?

[dumbledore11214]

No: HPFGUIDX 149046

> Pippin:
> I hate to let the facts get in the way of a good story, much less 
a good
> argument. But barring Flints, it's conclusive  that an 
Unforgivable Curse didn't
> kill Dumbledore (and thanks, Nora, for pointing out the thematic 
significance
> of that.) The closed eyes and the blood are facts on the ground. 
Literally.  
> The BANG on the tower has been undermined already, by JKR herself. 
> <SNIP>
>

Alla:

Conclusive? Sorry, but who determined with absolute certainty that 
Dumbledore's body who was just killed with Avada ( that is just my 
opinion of course) cannot bleed right after the fall. In fact, who 
determined that such thing never happens in RL? I am sorry, Pippin 
but to me it does not even come close to be any kind of 
conclusiveness. IMO this is just your interpetation, which is as 
valid as any other interpretation, but it is NOT a fact. I mean, 
blood on DD IS a fact, but that he was not killed by Avada is NOT a 
fact.

IMO of course,

Alla