Maligning Lupin was Re: JKR has Mystery Writer-related to Tower Theories-long!
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Tue Mar 14 16:59:07 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 149610
Kim:
. Though I also admit I growl at anyone who so maligns Lupin's character
as to make him evil. He's my hero. But I think that when the last book
comes out we'll all find that we are way off track.
<snip>
> But I beg of you all to please keep on trying because your posts are a
wonderful substitute to keep us fulfilled until the real thing comes along.
Just do me one favor, please? Leave Lupin alone? Thanks. :-)
Pippin:
::looks innocent:: You're not talking about _me_ are you? <veg> I'm
not the one saying Lupin is too weak or passive to do the right thing.
I'm not even saying he's a monster (though I'll admit I've theorized it
in the past.) I'm saying he's made conscious, rational, human choices
that set morality aside.
That's not unthinkable for a hero...plenty of people have said they'd like
to see Dumbledore or Harry do it, especially if morality
means protecting people like the Dursleys or Voldemort, or
Umbridge. And the books often seem to laud rule-breaking and even
law-breaking on occasion. But one view is that rules and laws are only
machines to help us make moral choices, and like all machines they
can't be expected to function perfectly in every situation. Sometimes
what they ask you to do is not right.
But knowing that what the rule or the law asks him to do *is* right,
and yet choosing not to obey it is a choice that Lupin has made,
by his own admission, many times. I think what Rowling wants to
show us is that the moral sense is fragile -- it can be damaged even
before birth, as Riddle's was--but it can be damaged also by misuse.
Ignore your principles too often and maybe they won't kick in when
you need them.
It's true that if JKR reveals Lupin in this light it will destroy
some of our sympathy for him -- but I think JKR might be okay
with that. She's an activist, you know -- just follow the
links from her site and you'll see. I don't think she means to allow
us the luxury of feeling sorry for werewolves -- or single parents,
or people with ms or children in cage beds. She'd rather we were
fighting mad.
She's got no use for sympathy, IMO. Sympathy says it wishes
there was something it could do. Sympathy turns the page. It's
anger that says, "This can't go on."
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive