LID!Snape rides again and again; and necklace
puduhepa98 at aol.com
puduhepa98 at aol.com
Sat Mar 18 00:05:47 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 149767
>Olivier:
>That said, if Snape is DDM and if he didn't know what was Draco's
>mission, he made a very foolish decision to lie to Bellatrix and
>Narcissa. That set in motion dire events.
Nikkalmati:
Happy St. Patrick's day to all!
It seemed like a good idea at the time! <g>
Seriously, I believe the events at Spinner's End are very important
to interpreting the story. I have a very hard time seeing any
ESESnape or LIDSnape or OFHSnape payoff for taking the vow. OFHSnape
would never make such a binding commitment. ESESnape would not
openly go against Voldemort's plan. LIDSnape does not help Harry by
protecting Draco. We are talking about instant death here. Snape
must know that binding magical contracts can go astray and turn to
bite you. He could not reasonable assume he would escape unscathed,
therefore,he needs a reason to take the vow beyond comforting
Narcissa or impressing Bella IMO. My personal interpretation is
that he was fishing for information about Draco's assignment. I
cannot believe he would take the vow if he knew Draco was assigned
to kill DD. Was he lying about knowing? Yes.
Further speculation leads to the question, when did he know? Well,
once the poisoned wine was sent to DD, it would be pretty clear what
was going on. A question I want to raise is, what was the purpose of
poisoning the necklace? Was Katie Bell going to walk up to DD and
say "here I brought you this necklace"? Therefore, I don't think it
was clear after this incident who was the intended victim. Perhaps,
the victim was someone else, but who would it have been?
Nikkalmati
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive