Amortentia and re The morality of love potions/Merope and Tom Sr.
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Fri May 19 18:50:58 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 152511
> Pippin:
> The marriage was made as soon as the partners gave free consent
> in a recognized way...and the law in 1926 did not recognize
persuasion by
> means other than force as coercion. Annulments were very rare and
> not given on grounds of emotional bondage, period. There was a
> time earlier when annulments were only given for consanguinity or
> prior contract, so even if someone were holding a weapon to your head
> when you said, "I do" you were still legally married. Think of it!
Things
> had progressed some by 1926, but not as far as you seem to think,
> from my admittedly internet-based and non-expert research.
a_svirn:
On the other hand, it was possible in those times to get rid of
unwanted wife if you proved that she was a witch. Things progressed
somewhat by 1926, but one wonders if, perhaps, they were better off in
1526 in this respect.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive