Defense of Snape in POA. Was:Re: Snape, Apologies, and Redemption
huntergreen_3
huntergreen3 at aol.com
Wed May 24 20:40:58 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 152830
Leslie41 wrote:
> "Keeping the plot interesting" does not constitute a defense of
> the character's actions morally. It's a cop out.
Lupinlore replied:
>>> EXACTLY! Which is precisely, IMO, why Dumbledore's reprehensible
failure to intervene at the Dursleys [snip] <<<
BAW:
>>The Dursleys are another matter; I don't understand why DD didn't
intervene before HBP. All I can think is that (a) the Blood
Protection was the only way to keep Harry alive, and that as
miserable as Harry's life with the Dursleys was, it was a LIFE, which
is better than the alternative; and (b) before he realized how horrid
the Dursleys were, DD agreed that in exchange for the Dursleys taking
Harry in, he would not interfere in how they chose to raise him
[snip] But I acknowledge that this is rather weak, and hope that we
learn more in Book VII.<<
HunterGreen:
Perhaps it was more simple than that. I think we already have our
explanation, simply that he had no other choice than the Dursleys.
After that it could have been a combination of not knowing how bad
the situation was and being unable to do anything about it. Vernon
and Petunia *hated* having Harry there (and as horrible as that is,
its not like they OFFERED to take Harry in), it was a near miracle
that they took him in. If Dumbledore or some other magical person
stepped in and threatened them or "had a talk" with them, the
response was likely to be, "Fine, YOU take him then!".
They were treating Harry awfully, but they weren't starving him, or
putting him in the hospital with injuries (and anything that horrible
was likely to cause spurts of magic), in other words, Harry wasn't
going to die or end up irreparably damaged, so therefore he was
still, in a strange way, better off there. Mrs. Figg lived down the
road and after a few years Harry was in school (where any serious
injuries or signs of neglect would be noticed), so its not like he
was *completely* abandoned.
The protection from Petunia's blood had the desired effect at least.
It was Neville's family who were attacked a few years after
Voldemort's downfall; and Harry would not have lived in GoF had the
plan to kidnap Harry not involved a portkey (if, for example, Peter
could just barge into the Dursley's house in the middle of the night
and kidnap him).
-HunterGreen/Rebecca
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive