Scary Teachers - Good Teachers (was: Re: Hagrid and Snape...
ClareWashbrook at aol.com
ClareWashbrook at aol.com
Wed May 24 23:30:00 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 152845
PERSPECTIVE ON TEACHERS:
Can I give a teacher's perspective here? I teach English Literature and
Language to 11-18 yr olds. In my faculty there are various kinds of teachers.
The most effective blend fear and interest. There are those who think of
nothing but classroom management, they usually come across badly because the
subject matter suffers for their rules, but part of that is the unpredictability
of their rules because they are fearfully reactive (they know that they
don't have the power). There are those who exist for fluffy compassion - they
are loved but only succeed with the non-problem kids.
I work within a house system, allied to one house (actually pretty much a
chav equivalent of Slytherin) and teach only that house and the house which has
mixed classes with them. The other two houses have different teachers. My
compassion and insight is reserved for my form as there is only time to apply
it there (an ideal is great but Time is the lord of all teachers). Two of
us (myself being one) give out more punishments than three other teachers
combined, but only to specific classes because they provide all of the hassle.
Some kids like me, some kids hate me, some think that I am out for their blood
- some are right. All teachers have favourites and some let this be known.
All teachers have children that they would rather had never been born. All
teachers are hated by some children. All teachers have some students that
they will instantly look to when something goes wrong. Teachers are human and
children are not complete beings who understand themselves and respond
appropriately to the system (and the system is flawed, fallible and inadequate to
cater to all needs). If Harry was in my class he would be in a lot of
trouble, as would Draco and Ron - they do not accept their punishments, they talk
back, they are off topic and focus on matters that are not class oriented.
What makes a good teacher? One who gets the subject matter to penetrate
their skulls in a manner that sticks - the way this is achieved may be variable
or tried and tested but whatever works. Who cares really? If your kid is a
little git and shouting at him will get him a C instead of a D then who would
decry the shouting? Well, some do but they got Fs and work in chip shops
and buy fags for their 12 year olds.
Can a scary teacher be a good teacher? Most good teachers are more or less
a little scary and most are a little funny but many students are too dim to
realise this. Scary teachers are not always good teachers. I think that
Snape is a good teacher to a certain extent. His problem is emotional
personalisation - but I don't teach a subject where things explode, nor am I a spy with
death hanging over my head. I'd act out a LOT if I was.
Children are not all equal in potential, children cannot be saved or overtly
influenced as to their character by teachers. Children are created in being
and bearing according to their upbringing. Occassionally, very
occassionally one gets a child who is something more, like Harry, the antithesis of the
socio-educational osmosis offered since birth. They are so so rare. The
abused child defecates in his pants, sets of fire alarms and steals from
potential friends. The son of the bully bullies, threatens teachers, storms out of
school, smokes on the premises and gets arrested during the holidays. The
child of a lawyer takes charge of her drama group and stays after school for
revision clubs. The child of the parent who plays it by ear and hopes it will
all go well is confused and lost and never fails but never achieves their
potential.
Teachers do not ruin lives, nor do they ruin education. At most they will
put a student off a subject; I dropped geography to avoid a creep myself -
that doesn't mean that I never learnt any during my lifetime acquisition of
world knowledge.
For the record, Hermione would annoy the hell out of me. I had one and
although she knew the answers, she was self-obsessed and the teacher has to give
others their chance, no, their right to participate and communicate. One
cannot always pander to the know it all, they will succeed anyway and there are
others who need to be pushed, prodded and forced along the road to
comprehension.
I am not Snape, but I do have my moments and there are five Snapes at my
school. Something to remember - if the teacher did not think that the students
were capable of doing it then it wouldn't matter to them, it wouldn't
irritate them. For a teacher to get wound up about a student they have to both care
and believe that the student has the potential to do better than they are
doing.
Just a perspective!
And another one is that JKR is not a teacher and the characters are meant to
signify other aspects of the plotline (such as problematic partisanship), not
necessarily embody a educational philosophy.
smiles,
Clare xx
(Please don't shoot me for that being personal; how could it not be?)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive