Blood, Voldie Baby, Horcruxes, Wands

[Tonks]

No: HPFGUIDX 153025

--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "kibakianakaya" <ldorman at ...> 
wrote: 
> 
> These two threads of thought came together into the idea that, if 
> the Final Battle occurs in the DoM, Harry may vanquish Voldemort 
by turning him into a *baby*!  I see the following scenario.
> 
>

Tonks:
First, I don't think that we will go back to the MoM. I think that 
she will do something new. 

As to the almost babylike Voldie, I have no idea. I wonder if it is 
somehow connected to the fact that LV now has Harry's blood and the 
fact that it is also Lily's blood. My first thought on that was that 
a baby that was never loved will have love in his blood now and a 
second chance to go to the good side, but that is crazy. I don't 
think that LV will ever go to the good side. Another thought is 
this:  What happens when you have the blood of your victim in your 
own body?  What type of ancient magic does this invoke? And Harry's 
blood is both from his mother and his father, both victims of LV.  
There must be something in the blood of the martyrs here somewhere, 
but I don't know what it is.  Any ideas?

Also speaking of Horcruxes..   I have been wondering again about the 
wand in Ollivander's.  I know that somehow we got around to it being 
Ravenclaw's wand, but do we really know that for sure?

I am starting to think that it IS the tiara that is Ravenclaw's and 
that Gryffindor wand is the one that was in the window.

Ollivander's has been in business long before the age of the 
founding of Hogwarts. One of Mr. Ollivander's ancestors must have 
made the wand for at least one of the founders of Hogwarts.  And we 
have Gryffindor's sword and his hat, makes sense that his wand would 
be somewhere too. I know that the song the Slughorn sang implies 
that a wand is snapped in two at a wizards death, but so is his hat 
turned inside out, and we have the hat intact, so why not the wand 
too?

Tonks_op