Nice vs. Good - Compassion
puduhepa98 at aol.com
puduhepa98 at aol.com
Tue May 30 03:58:50 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 153110
>Pippin:
We have different definitions. My dictionary says compassion is a *deep*
awareness of others' suffering, coupled with the desire to relieve it. It
does
not take a deep awareness of suffering to notice when someone is
dissolving in tears, under the cruciatus curse, kidnapped by a bloodthirsty
monster,bleeding to death from multiple wounds or lying in a dementor-
induced coma.
>Snape doesn't seem to be aware of suffering when it
presents itself more subtly, Whether that's because he doesn't care, or
because he doesn't easily pick up cues from other people, is hard to
say at this point. <snip>
>
Nikkalmati:
So a major act of compassion doesn't count because it is too easy? Little
acts of compassion are more important? I'm sure you have head the saying
"handsome is as handsome does." In my view it applies to Snape. He has to be
judged by his actions, not what he says. I think we are discussing here in
another guise polite or kind vs. good. Snape does not care for weakness or
whining (as he would see it), but he recognizes real need and responds
appropriately. IMO this meets the definition of a deep awareness of others suffering
and a desire to relieve it.
Nikkalmati
>>Lanval:
> If anyone else, say, Lupin, had brought the Unconscious Four up to
> the castle, would you still classify the stretchers as kindness --
> or perhaps as a practical decision (because I would imagine
> stretchers from a magical hospital already to be equipped with a
> levitating spell of some sort, hence making it much easier to move
> along, instead of walking while having to maintain a spell on four
> different people.)? Just a thought.
Nikkalmati:
I don't see the kindness as conjuring a stretcher for Sirius, but as having
brought him back to the castle at all. He could have left him there or
called the dementors back. Neither of these choices is consistent with Snape's
character IMO, At this point Sirius is an escaped murderer to DD and to
everyone else who was not aware of the events in the Shack, including Snape. He is
unaware of the alternate version of the events after Godric Hollow and he
probably blames Sirius for the deaths of James and Lily as well as the 12
Muggles and a deadly threat to Harry. In fact, Snape would have been totally
within the law to have killed Sirius on sight. Some listees may say he did not
kill him because he wanted to call on the dementors to suck his soul. Well,
he didn't do it when he found him lying unconscious by the lake. I think he
threatened Sirius in the shack to twist his chain a bit and to gain control of
the situation.
Nikkalmati
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive