Uninformed Harry: Good or Plot Contrivance (was: Re: JKR and the boys (and girls)

[Melanie]

No: HPFGUIDX 161601

> >>Lupinlore wrote:
>> <snip>   
>> Often it feels that characters react in unbelievable ways simply because it is convenient for the plot that they do so. Thus, why does DD come up with such a bizarre way of treating Harry in OOTP, not even bothering with a note saying "I know this is hard on you but trust me, I have my reasons?" or better yet having Sirius convey such a sentiment along the lines of "I've talked to Dumbledore and he promises his bizarre behavior and decisions will be fully explained" or if Sirius must be isolated having McGonnagall convey the same information. Because it is convenient for the plot that he come up with such an inexplicable and ludicrous approach to the situation, just as it is convenient that McGonnagall take her idiotic stance with regard to Harry and Umbridge. << <snip>


Melanie's reply:  I see your point about someone conveying the information about Dumbledore but if he was really scared about the connection he and Harry have getting out don't you think that he did the right thing.  McGonnagall worked in an institution that monitored the owls, classes, and basically every movement the teachers and students did.  It was scary the extent that Umbridge went through.  Similiarly, Sirius couldn't owl him, and the fireplace was not fool proof.  Perhaps, the mirror would have worked but we don't even know.  
   
I think that keeping Harry in the dark was what they felt was best.  Knowing Harry he would try and convince DD that it's not fair...Harry, like his father, doesn't really follow many  rules after all does he?  
   
Melanie