Snape didn't make the Unbreakable Vow
Jen Reese
stevejjen at earthlink.net
Sat Nov 18 13:58:10 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 161656
Becca:
> I'm not, however, necessarily saying that Snape shouldn't have
> killed. This very well could be an Obi Wan "If you strike me down
> I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine" kind
> of situation. I'm reserving judgement on that until Book 7.
Jen: I've wondered about this alot since HBP--what could have been
gained by Dumbledore dying? If he was willingly sacrificed, there's
always the possibility an ancient magic was activated since that
seems to be an undercurrent of the entire series starting with
Lily's sacrifice. Then when Voldemort used Harry's blood in the
rebirthing potion, *something* changed--ancient magic at work there
or merely a mistake on Voldemort's part? Maybe that's too much
ancient magic floating around!
Dumbledore is the master of contingency planning, I imagine he would
know of a way to help Harry even in death (besides ensuring human
protection). And there's a pattern of Voldemort's seemingly biggest
triumphs becoming his downfall because of a 'mistake', something
overlooked. He will think Dumbledore being killed was one of his
biggest coups and I'd really like to see it be part of his defeat.
Jen R.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive