[HPforGrownups] Harry's happy death /Potter family wealth - On the Nature of Elves
Magpie
belviso at attglobal.net
Sun Nov 19 21:41:24 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 161699
Julie:
> Wow. So JKR's message is if a teenager sees death/afterlife as
> preferable to life, we should applaud that sentiment and even
> rejoice when he is given (or chooses) his heart's desire. If
> it's too hard to live, boys and girls, embrace death because
> you'll get to see all your previously departed loved ones.
> No need to work on improving your unhappy life when you can
> just end it and get on with your reward.
Magpie:
I totally agree with you, but wanted to add one series where the main
character(s) die without it seemingly being a problem with popularity is
Narnia. An ending I do find really bizarre, but illustrating Lewis' own view
of this world as the Shadowlands, with "real life" not starting until after
death. (There's also books like Bridge to Terebithia, Old Yeller, Sadako and
the Thousand Paper Cranes--death in general is a big theme for children's
books, but not always of the main character.)
I don't think Harry's story supports that kind of ending, myself. The book
just isn't about death as much as, say, Tolkien's is. I mean, there's a lot
of death in it, and one of the messages is not to fear death, but it doesn't
seem to have put in the right foundation for Harry's death to me. Of course,
if that's how it goes I might change my mind.
Steve:
All Harry has to do is ask, and I'm sure Dobby would jump at the chance.
Further I predict that is exactly
what will happen. Let's face it, Kreacher is a pretty
much worthless house-elf; he doesn't clean and who
would want that filthy unstable creature cooking for
them.
So, once again, I predict that Dobby will join Harry
at 12 Grimmauld Place, and help take care of things,
inclucing Harry.
I predict Kreacher's death, sometimes I suspect by his own hand, though I'm
not willing to predict that aspect of it. Kreacher is very old and generally
useless, so I don't see him long for this world. Actually, I had previously
assumed he would already be dead; can't get them all right though.
Magpie:
I can't help but be a little amused at your continually calling Kreacher
useless given how much he affected the plot. Seems to me he's more
rebellious and often depressed than useless. (Also it keeps making me think
of the Black ancestor who beheaded house elves when they got too old to
carry tea trays.) Underestimating Kreacher was a bad thing to do in OotP. He
seems like he'd be more useful to the Blacks.
Harry himself called Kreacher, not Dobby, to do work for him in HBP--which
was kind of surprising. I can't get over Harry the slaveowner. Basically
he's got the choice between Kreacher who is a slave but doesn't act like
one, and Dobby who isn't an actual slave but acts like one. (And Hermione
having no problem with Kreacher whatsoever, somehow.)
However, I'm hoping there's no more cleaning to be done at Grimmauld
Place--I had quite enough of the never-ending housecleaning in OotP and
would hope Molly had finished by now. (In fact, that housecleaning might get
them into trouble re: that Slytherin locket.) Harry's a healthy 17-year-old
boy-it's not like he needs a personal valet or a slave. But then, I'm also
hoping we don't get the Dursleys at Grimmauld Place since I don't yet see
the point of it except an extended Ton-Tongue Toffee incident after we
probably already get Ron and Hermione inviting themselves to stay on Privet
Drive for the summer. JKR's got a lot of stuff to deal with in Book VII. I
don't see how teasing the Dursleys gets that done. The only main thing that
seems important for them to do is reveal whatever it is Petunia knows.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive