Where will the "great battle" be (was: Some thoughts and questions)
MercuryBlue
MercuryBlue144 at aol.com
Sat Nov 25 20:48:29 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 161945
Carol:
> the only way I can think of for Harry to kill a de-Horcruxed
Voldemort
> without AKing him is to send him through the Veil.
MercuryBlue:
If the Horcruxes aren't there anymore, what's keeping Harry from
decapitating Voldemort with a spell or the Sword of Gryffindor? Or
strangling him with magic or a length of rope? Or putting a bullet
or a Reducto through his chest? Or--heck, pick your poison (ooh,
poison, that works too), there's certainly enough ways to die. Blunt
force trauma probably won't cut it, given how Hagrid reacted when
told that the Potters supposedly died in a car crash (that and how
it's been years since anyone's died in a Quidditch match, when
taking a ten-inch iron ball to the head is not a terribly uncommon
occurrence), but there's still umpteen billion ways to kill someone,
and I can't see why Voldemort would have put in the effort to
protect himself against as many of them as he could think of. Why
would he bother with a spell against burning to death and a spell
against drowning and et cetera and so forth, when the existence of
his Horcrux(es) meant he couldn't die?
MercuryBlue
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive