Readers in the WW (was: JKR and "Think of the Children!")
horridporrid03
horridporrid03 at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 28 23:02:06 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 162104
> >>Betsy Hp:
> > Except the non-reading occurs in the very real life setting of
> > the Dudley suburban home. So I don't think your original "rule"
> > even applies.
> >>Alla:
> I think what Neri meant ( hopefully I understand it) is that it
> would screw the feeling of Potterverse in general as **real** ( as
> much as it can be), as in it would be easier to think - if Harry
> reads the fiction that when he goes to WW, it is all product of his
> imagination, regardless of whether he started reading fiction at
> Dursleys or not.
> <snip>
Betsy Hp:
Why assume that the only fiction out there is fantasy? Why assume
that the only books on Dudley's shelf are fantasy? Why assume that
if JKR wanted to make Harry as book-lover or a reader she'd have
limited him to the fantasy genre?
All I'm saying is that Harry doesn't touch the books on Dudley's
shelf. He is not a reader.
> >>Betsy Hp:
> > <snip>
> > (Honestly, I find the scramble to try and show that Harry *is* a
> > book lover a bit amusing too. Why does he need to be?
> > <snip>
> >>Alla:
> It is not a point of whether he needs to be or not to me, it is a
> point of some of us indeed seeing Harry picking up a book, thus
> concluding that he reads at least something, you know?
Betsy Hp:
Harry reads his school books, yes. But no canon has been presented
to show that Harry reads for the pleasure of reading. And he
certainly doesn't read any fiction (and fiction does not mean just
fantasy, to be clear). Ergo, he is not a reader; he is not a book-
lover. (Which, as Magpie pointed out, does not suggest that Harry is
illiterate.) And that's *fine*. So yes, the scramble still amuses.
Betsy Hp
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive