Harry and the house-elves---another view
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 29 19:18:37 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 162151
> Alla:
> <snip>
> > And I do not see wizards go and try to imprison Giants. Who sure
are
> > dangerous and violent, many of them. <snip>
>
> Carol:
> So you concede that giants are by nature different from humans
(Wizard
> or not).
a_svirn:
That's hardly such an important concession to make. It's perfectly
obvious that they are *different* by nature they aren't human after
all. But *different* doesn't mean *inferior* or *servile* by nature.
It only means different.
> Carol:
Maybe house-elves are different by nature, too, not only in
> their appearance and their magical abilities but in their
psychology.
a_svirn:
Or maybe not. Their emotions seems to be perfectly human.
> > Alla:
> > And again, I disagree, if I had been given to see up close and
> > personal three house elves only, I may assume that those are
> > **typical** house elves. IMO of course.
>
> Carol:
> How can Kreacher, Dobby, and winky be typical when they're all so
> different from each other and from the hundreds of house-elves at
> Hogwarts, who are virtually indistinguishable?
a_svirn:
How do you know that they are different from the mass of elves that
you yourself call indistinguishable? My dictionary says about
indistinguishable:
1. a. Incapable of being discriminated or recognized as *different*
from something else, or from each other; of which the *difference*
[emphasis mine a_svirn] cannot be perceived. Also as n.
> Carol, thinking that lifting whatever enchantment is placed on
> house-elves is not the answer; the only solution is understanding
> their nature and respecting their needs
a_svirn:
I am afraid the task of understanding anyone's "nature" is a bit too
demanding. We, humans can't even understand our own nature most of
the time. Respecting their needs, now, this sounds reasonable.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive