O O O It's Magic (More Wombat Love)
Talisman
talisman22457 at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 10 14:34:20 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 159340
Greetings
Once again we are left to prod the bloody entrails of exam results,
hoping some patterns congeal, so that we can conjure our clues from
the stinking carnage.
But, as we will see, the mysteries of Ms Rowling's "quite
complicated" marking system, run deep.
I took the exam twice (toggling 4.3 answers) and got Outstanding
both times.
This was a bit of a hoot, as I considered some of my second choice
answers to be "clearly wrong."
Thus, like others, I sought clarity in comparison.
Between responses on HPfGUs and a small group, I felt I was coming
to some consensus...just needed a *little* more input to clear up
some close calls...
Bam. Anne gave me 5 sets of "O" answers from the Leaky that blew
everything out of the cauldron.
Here then, for your edification and bewilderment, are the results of
my tabulations.
All of these, mind you, represent putative "O" answers.
(Best if you have a hard copy of the exam, to play along at home.)
1. A=7; B=4
2. A=1; B=6; C=1; D=1; E=2
3. A=1; C=5; E=5
4. A=1; D=10
5. B=2; C=9
6. B=2; C=3; D=2; E=4
7. A=2; B=5; C=4
8. A=2; B=8; C=1
9. A=5; B=5; D=1
10. A=3; B=1; C=7
11. C=11
12. A=1; B=9; D=1
13. B=7; F=2; G=3; H=3, I=8; M=1; N=2; O=3; W=2; X=1, ?=1
14. C=1; D=8; E=2
15. C=7; E=4
16. B=6; C=5
17. A=10; B=1
18. B=5; D=5; E=1
I don't know about you, but I find this all very troubling.
Sure there is one consensus, and a number of clear majorities. But
there are still too many close calls. And some of these were going a
different way before I got the Leaky five, three of which come from
the same family, where people were sharing ideas.
`Course my two come from the same head.
Moreover, even if weighted credit were given for all answers, it's
hard to believe that someone could miss so many best answers and
still get the O. Yet it seems that some or the other of us did.
That, or we are dealing with tampered memories.
Pas moi, I wrote them down as I went.
So, I guess we just need more "O" data.
Not to slight anyone else, but I don't think I can handle the
variations where even more answers are in error.
If enough O's start agreeing, I'll be happy to toss out anomalies as
likely products of a Confundus Charm. (No darling, Outstanding
doesn't start with a "T.")
On a popularity basis, here's how matters stand at present:
1. A. Hags eat children, small or otherwise (picked 7 times out of
11). Bathilda Bagshot says so. (FB xi)
2. B. Freshwater merpeople are NOT less warlike than salt (6 times
out of 11). Ask the giant squid.
3. Tied between Inferi and WW (5 each). My money's on Inferi.
4. D. Poltergeists have never died, never will (10 of 11). For once,
tradition and Rowling concur.
5. C. Goblins want their wands, pal. Nine of 11 O's agree.
6.One scrambled mess with E having a slight edge (4). Come on. You
know they do.
7. B. House-elf house allegiance wins with a scant 5. Guess Elladora
had some premature axe-ulations.
8. B. The wizard on the street wants more action (8 of 11). Don't
we all. HP variety, of course.
9. Tied up 5 to 5, with those parents bitching about DADA and CoMC.
Let's ask Kettleburn.
10. C. 53% of the wizards who were buttoned-holed agreed to
regulation (7 of 11).
11. C. Lots of excitement over WW bites. 11 of 11 agree. Tonks
says they kinda tickle.
12. B. 18% of the WW wants to keep the Wizengamot tujours pur (9 of
11).
13. Partial credit dilutes majority significance, IMO. FWIW, I (8)
and B(7) score high. I'll take the IC, but decline the (broom) shaft.
14. D. It's reparo, baby. Not even superglue comes close; 8 of 11
know it.
15. C. Wouldn't it be nice if Hermione could just Google "Prince?"
Nothing like computers (7).
16. At 6 (B) and 5 (C), it's too close to call. Is there a Wizard
in your tree? Or can you laugh at Dragon Pox? I'll take C.
17.A. After 6 books and innumerable interviews, 10 of 11 have
figured out that Muggles can't do Magic.
18. Tied up at 5 and 5, those Insensitive (D) Muggles are in Danger
(B).
A few more personal observations:
1. There is solid canon for hags eating children. Conversely, there
is abundant reason to infer that Inferi can be programmed to do any
number of things, including certainly--in a world where so many
normally inanimate objects can--speak.
The creepy co-opted cadaver of someone we know could show up for a
chat in Book 7!
::evil frissions of delight::
Zombie-Lily drags one foot as she gropes toward our
hero: "Harry...you have my eyes...give them back."
2. I welcomed the Merpeople answer as it finally gave an authorial
explanation for the difference between the picture of the snoozing
blonde in the Prefect's bathroom, and those delightful green-haired
lunatics in the lake.
And, it's specifically because we have a basis for finding it false
that I chose the Merpeople answer. For the rest, we either had
reason to find the statement true, or no acceptable evidence at all.
The ghost business was tricky. Liquid was obvious but gas might have
been a trap...until I recalled that Sir Patrick's severed head toots
a horn in CoS. In a game of inference, that's close enough for me.
There's no evidence for the rest, so the following Question 2
comments are pure drivel.
We know WW snouts are distinguishable. It seems reasonable that
they should be, proportionally, shorter than those of a real wolf.
1) They start out from a comparatively flat human faces; and 2) real
wolves have pretty long snouts, already. WWs would look a bit like
anteaters if they had noticeably longer ones.
No male Veela, eh? Well, from a metaphorical stand point...there's
plenty of monstrous pretty-boys out there...but, as women generally
don't fall for looks alone...seems right to me.
Now that we know that Hags only have four toes, all I can say is:
you might want to check under the footwear before you take her
home. Just to be sure.
3. The answer is Inferi.
The MoM employed Dementors, hags can be found in pubs (see warning,
above), we've seen vampires at holiday parties, and werewolves have
a liaison office.
Process of elimination, alone, gets you to Inferi.
Add in the MoM pamphlet warnings, Snape's poster of what they do to
you (a bloody smudge), and the fact that the best DD could do was
hold them at bay (hard to use all that fire in your house or public
areas), I'm willing to believe the MoM considers them most dangerous.
6. Ah, the giants.
I believe that answers a, b, and c are all negated by reasonable
inference from canon. Answers a and b are nixed by the fact that
both Gurgs represented are male and of the largest of their kind.
Answer c is negated by Olympe's use of the Conjunctivitis Curse,
when she and Hagrid are trying to escape hostile giants.
The Conjunctivitus Curse itself goes specifically to quality of
eyesight. If a wizard who is capable enough to be Headmistress of
one of the three largest schools in the WW uses a spell tailored to
impair eyesight, the clear inference is that the eyesight was good
to begin with, not "very poor compared to humans."
That leaves nocturnal or cannibals.
When Hagrid and Olympe reach the giant's reservation, it is already
night. They decide to watch and wait until morning. It is noted
that the giants don't fall asleep until about 3AM, at which point
they pass out where they sit.
While we don't know the exact date or location of this experience,
3AM is the lion's share of the night in most locales. I'll bet they
aren't in a hurry to get up in the morning, either.
Grawp was certainly snoozing when Harry and Hermione went to meet
him in the middle of the day.
I'm prepared to say that giants are up "most of the night and some
of the day," and that "nocturnal" isn't a bad answer.
However, I think the even better answer is cannibals.
Heck, in desperate situations--such as confinement to close
territory with limited resources--humans have demonstrated a ready
ability to enjoy a same-species repast, or two.
The giants are trapped in a small area, and I'll bet 80 (plus or
minus) giants go through a lot of goats at one sitting.
The "mean" Gurg was wearing a necklace that included what appeared
to be human bones.
Now, it may not be considered cannibalism for giants to eat humans
(though they interbreed, as evidenced by both Hagrid and Olympe),
but it's pretty close.
Giants don't seem to have any moral qualms about killing each other,
or tearing each other into handy bite-sized pieces. I find it hard
to believe they would let a good meaty haunch go to waste in
preference of a few goat snacks (if available), especially if they
have no problem eating other humaniod beings.
Yep. I'm betting many of `em are willing to eat each other. Naughty
me. Wonder what Grawp's into.
7. Here I remain somewhat ambivalent. I toggled between the life
expectancy and allegiance answers, and as the other O's did the
same, it's hard to draw any conclusive patterns.
My reasoning is the same, or similar to what has already been said.
Elladora's program was started less than 200 years ago and has
netted, not just one, but a row of heads. The Inference is that you
can go through a lot of elves in less than 200 years.
A house-elf's foremost allegiance is clearly to the bloodline of the
family it is attached to. If Barty Sr. had gone off to a sanatorium
in Switzerland, and summoned Winky back to his side, she would have
gone in a gleeful twinkling--no tears wasted on Chez Crouch.
I notice that a lot of folks talk about how Kreature was left to
Harry, along with GP. That speaks of ownership, and the need to
obey, but it doesn't reach Kreature's feelings in the matter.
Kreature would clearly prefer to work for Bella. He continues to
express his preference for Draco (House of Black) even though Harry
now owns GP (house as structure).
In the hierarchy of things, it's clear that an elf feels greater
loyalty to the estate (and chattels) of it's long time family--
snogging old britches, and all--than to any mere "inhabitants" who,
as we see when the Order takes over GP, may not have anything to do
with the bloodline, at all.
As a relative statement, or in the unlikely event that "it's house"
was meant to differ from "the house" (bloodline vs. structure) the
statement will pass as true and we can clearly select the 200 year
lifespan as the correct (False) answer. Otherwise it's false. House
elf's loyalty is to the family, not the structure or it's
inhabitants du jure.
It's probably false, and therefore, the correct answer.
The Black family elves just weren't good at carrying tea trays.
10. Not so much about the selection process, which was idiosyncratic
(weather generally not modified, blah blah, blah), but what the
topic brought back to mind.
I have always thought that DD modified the weather on at least 2
occasions (on page).
The first is in Book 1 where the weather man earnestly promises rain
the night Harry is left at the Dursleys, but none comes.
The second is where the Advanced Guard comes for Harry. There has
been a drought all summer, but the guard and Harry are drenched as
they fly through the cloud cover overhead.
In both cases DD is concerned with high level security and I think
there is a direct connection.
Is she nudging us to consider weather modification spells as a topic
beyond the exam?
Hmmm.
As for the poll, I went with 53%, and still don't care.
13. You already have your wand (take the hint, you're magic).
I reject any consideration of what the average wizard has on hand.
As the questions stands, all options are at my disposal.
The Invisibility Cloak seems to be the no-brainer.
For travel, personally, I'm going to pack light and Apparate.
I don't fear running into anti-apparation jinxes at every turn, and
I don't want to fuss with carrying a broom stick while I'm slinking
about in my IC or running, dodging, and shooting curses.
Let's face it, even if the DEs had taken brooms to the MoM, strapped
them to their backs while fighting, and then managed to get them
between their legs after DD arrived in the Death Chamber, they would
only have been able to ride as far as the elevator, after which
point they would have been better off Apparating instead of pushing
the button for an exit floor.
All other forms of travel, Floo Powder included (not only do you
need a fireplace, but you have to shout about where you're going),
deteriorate from there.
If I've already got the IC, I have far less use for the inherently
limited Peruvian Darkness Powder, selection of which would also
mandate that I take the Hand of Glory as my final item, in order to
find my own way around in it. (Unless I just want to throw it
through the window of a DE hideout and run away laughing.)
Skip that.
It's already been noted that you can clout a foe in the head with
just about anything, including a cauldron, crystal ball, or good
brass scales. IMO they should all get you zero to negative points
for choosing--out of all this bounty--to tote such things into
battle.
Ditto Anti-Muggle doorknobs, Lunascopes, Omnioculars (hey, who hit
me?), Quick-Quotes Quills, Rememberalls, Parchment, Wireless, and
Telescopes.
Extendable Ears, Hand of Glory, Pensieves, Potion-making kits, and
Revealers have limited use in limited "trouble" situations--maybe
they would get "some" credit. Not much.
Foe-glass? Nah, I'd have to get a big one. Plus, Barty Jr.'s only
worked after DD, Snape, and McG had already kicked in the door. I'm
willing to take it on faith that anyone who smashes down my door is
a foe. Hagrid excepted.
Secrecy-Sensors and Sneakoscopes probably could get "some" credit--
but they go off for all sorts of goofy reasons, and who cares if
they are squealing like mad whilst you battle the Dark Lord?
Come to think of it, if you're hidden, they could give you away.
Glad I didn't pack any.
In addition to the IC, I took:
The Two-way mirror--because a handy, secure source of communication
with relevant allies--or loved ones you are trying to protect--is
always good.
The Time-Turner, because it kicks ass, definitely has been
demonstrated to change outcomes, and it's uses are only limited by
one's imagination.
16. I believe that Muggle-born witches are less susceptible to
magical illnesses. Moreover, I do not believe that being so impugns
their magical ability in any wise, as we know they are often "some
of the best" (Hr/Lily).
Rowling's definition of a squib is: "a non-magical person born to at
least one magical parent." No exception is made to infer that this
happens (rare as it is) more often to Muggle-born witches or
wizards.
Indeed her detailed discussion of how they lead marginal lives,
being in the WW but unable to participate, strongly suggests they
usually don't have family in the Muggle world (as has been noted).
Squibs, Rowling says, are "almost the opposite" of Muggle-born
wizards.
Q: "How does a Muggle-born like Hermione develop magical abilities?"
JKR: "Nobody knows where magic comes from. *Sometimes* it *seems*
to be inherited, but others are the only ones in their family who
have the ability." (Barnes & Noble 3/19/99, my emphasis)
*Sometimes* doesn't sound like *usually* to me.
Hermione is our best example of a Muggle-born witch, and she's
unlikely to have been slow to show magical ability. Ditto Lily.
Natural rhythm...yeah, like your average dentist.
My thinking is that unblended magical genes are likely more
vulnerable to magical diseases. I'll bet it IS harder for Hermione
to catch Dragon Pox.
That about wraps me up for WOMBATS II, unless there are other scores
that can shed light on the remaining ambiguities.
Talisman
PS:
Perhaps question 13 was another way for Rowling to highlight how
useful an IC really is, thus raising the critical matter of the
Potter garment, yet again.
I haven't been reading HPfGUs much, but last I looked no one was
saying what I think is obvious:
James left the IC with DD, for Harry, because James knew he was
going to die (and Harry wasn't) in the conflict at GH.
In the distant past, I've written extensively of how Lily's behavior
indicates she knew what was going to happen, and what her role in
matters required.
Shall we add James to the list?
All part of DD's plan, m'dears.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive