[HPforGrownups] The Look Of Triumph
Magpie
belviso at attglobal.net
Thu Oct 12 00:41:19 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 159483
Katherine Coble:
> Suppose that Harry was a horcrux, created that night at Godric's
> Hollow. But then further suppose that by <i>using Harry's blood for
> his resurrection</I> in the graveyard at Little Hangleton, Voldemort
> unknowingly invalidated Harry's position as Horcrux. In other
> words, Voldemort <I>already took back</I> that part of his soul.
Magpie:
But wouldn't Dumbledore have to have then told Harry that in HBP when he's
telling him about Horcruxes? He specifically tells Harry he knows about the
ring and the diary, then there's the locket, and then there's something from
the other founders maybe and perhaps Nagini. He goes through all the
possibilities in his mind and never mentions thinking Harry was a Horcrux
that's already been destroyed.
As much as I know Albus likes to withold information as long as possible,
and this time probably wound up dying before he got to reveal many things
(as the old man with the beard tends to do in these stories!) I don't think
he'd pretend to consider other Horcruxes if his look of triumph was over the
Harrycrux's destruction.
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive