[HPforGrownups] Re: Snape is still working for Dumbledore in book 6

[puduhepa98 at aol.com]

No: HPFGUIDX 159701

> montims:
> Ooh - I just flew off on a flight of fancy - if  they HAD made the UV, 
>who would have cast the spell? So I thought of  Aberforth, and I 
>realised it could have been done after the prophecy  eavesdropping 
>incident - Aberforth held on to Snape, DD finished with  Sybill, they 
>all three sat down for a little chat, Snape convinced them  of his good 
>intentions, bada bing bada boom, the UV was cast and Snape  was forever 
>after DDM.

>Tonks:
>I like the idea. This  would leave Aberforth able to tell Harry about 
>Snapes loyalties. The  only problem with this idea is that I don't think 
>that Snape switched  side until AFTER he gave the informantion to LV. So 
>while this idea  gives us someone to tell Harry the truthabout Snape, 
>the time line is  not quite right.

Nikkalmati:
 
Query: Why would DD allow SS to walk out of the Hog's Head with that  
information? He hired ST as Divination teacher to protect her from LV, so he  
realized the importance of the prophecy.  Aberforth  had SS by the  collar.  Why 
would DD let him go?  I suspect SS and DD reached an  understanding on that night.
 
Nikkalmati


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]