Dumbledore's lapses of Information (Was:CHAPDISC: HBP 23, Horcruxes)
Goddlefrood
gav_fiji at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 25 23:30:27 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 160339
> Snow:
> As for not hiding anything anymore from Harry I would have to say
> balderdash.
Goddlefrood:
You are correct from the standpoint of the two instances cited
(Dumbledore's suspicions of Draco and his failure to trust Harry with
the real reason he trusted Snape).
Having said this on the latter point at least Dumbledore offers an
explanation for trusting Snape, which has been analysed by numerous
contributors to this list and found wanting. All I would say on this
is that while the stated reason may not seem enough it may well be
truly the reason Dumbledore trusted Severus.
Regarding hiding his views on Draco the explanation proffered atop
the Tower when discussing the matter with Draco himself would fit
with Dumbledore's reluctance to inform Harry of absolutely
everything relative to Draco. Harry is hardly discrete and had
Dumbledore shown he was of the same view as Harry earlier with Harry
himself how long do you suppose Draco would have lasted?
To allow Draco's plot to reach fruition was arguably something
Dumbledore wanted.
In respect now of the information Dumbledore supplied regarding
Horcruxes themselves I formed the view while reading the relevant
chapter under discussion that Dumbledore gave Harry all the
information he had. That he did not mention Harry or his scar as a
potential Horcrux strengthened my opinion that neither Harry nor his
scar is a Horcrux. Dumbledore could have no reason to suppress that
particular information.
> Snow:
> Harry is equal to Voldemort according to the prophecy; Harry does
have a bit of Voldemort in him according to Dumbledore; and Harry has
displayed uncanny knowledge over Voldemort's feelings via his scar,
therefore I must conclude that there is a part of Voldemort within
Harry no matter how you slice the bread.
> We need to get past the Horcrux tie. Harry is not a Horcrux but he
does appear to obtain characteristics of a Horcrux, which is in fact
a portion of Voldemort
how can it not be.
Goddlefrood:
Dumbledore said that LV had transferred some of his powers to Harry
the night he obtained the scar, which is an important distinction.
A Horcrux in and of itself does not appear to have power, except to
revive the person who has need of reviving. It seems you suggest that
a Horcrux is a power in itself.
The Horcrux is the vessel for storing the external portion of soul,
unless I'm much mistaken. For any particularly interested in the
various ways in which external souls work there is available Chapter
66 "The External Soul in Folk-Tales" by Sir James George Frazer from
The Golden Bough. THis is at Bartlebys and other literature sites.
The only power attributed to the external soul is to keep the owner
of the soul alive no matter what happens and this aspect of the myth
appears to have been adhered to by JKR. In fact it is quite likely
that she followed the legend of Koschei the Deathless whose soul was
outside his body and there were seven levels of protection (although
not seven separate soul pieces) to destroy in order that he could
himself die.
Just some thoughts
Goddlefrood
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive