Identifying with Muggles in Potterverse
a_svirn
a_svirn at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 10 10:16:14 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 158118
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Lynda Cordova"
<moosiemlo at ...> wrote:
>
> a_svirn:
> Well, yes, using your extraordinary brainpower against someone,
let's
> say, *ordinary* means taking advantage of a certain power
imbalance.
> And you know what? It's not a pretty sight. It's a kind of snooty
> behaviour that earned Snape, for instance, his *slimy git*
reputation.
> But thing is, hard words break no bones. A curse might, though, all
> that and more. There's the difference.
>
> Lynda:
>
> But that's the point. What DD did to the Dursleys was not
hurtful, it was
> done gently and it was done to let them know that somebody at
least realizes
> that Harry was mistreated by the Dursleys and not just Harry but
that Dudley
> has come to harm under the care of the Dursleys senior himself.
BTW, the
> Dursleys treated DD very poorly in that scene. Vernon Dursley
simply has
> no manners whatsoever. (Yes I know it was late and he was
unexpected but
> still...)
>
a_svirn:
No, it's not the point. At least, not as far as I am concerned. The
point is, that although Dumbledore did not hurt the Dursleys
or "beat them into a bloody pulp" he did indeed used his magic in
order to intimidate them. Now, if you say that they deserved what
they got, it's OK with me. Personally I don't like the scene, but
again I understand that some people like to see the Dursleys getting
their butts kicked. What I don't understand is how you can possibly
say that an act of intimidation can be "gently done" (unless you are
being sardonic). Either he rebuked them, or he was gracious. You
can't bend it both ways.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive