Harry as a Non-crux - a few thoughts.

[Sweetp]

No: HPFGUIDX 158185

> Geoff:
> Dumbledore's comment was to highlight the risk - to Voldemort
> - of making a "live" Horcrux:
>
> '"The snake?" said Harry, startled. "You can use animals as
> Horcruxes?"
> "Well, it is inadvisable to do so," said Dumbledore, "because
> to confide a part of your soul to something that can think and
> move for itself is obviously a very risky business."'
> (HBP "Horcruxes" p.473 UK edition)
>
> Voldemort may have decided to take that risk either knowingly
> or blundered into it unknowingly. However, on this general
> question of destroying Horcruxes, >


Sweetp:
Just a thought I had while reading thru this wonderful form...
THE REPAYMENT OF WORMTAIL...THE KILLING OF THE SNAKE...since he
now posses a metal hand which Nagini would not be able to strike
or bite and..which would highlight Professor Dumbledor's words
above.

I have to say this too..."Neither can live while the other
survives...always get me because Professor Dumbledore always and
even get a little bothered when Harry harps on about the prophecy
which was made by Tom (not predicted) so what if is that Jo is not
talking about Harry and Tom, but about Tom and something or someone
else...But it is just Harry who has to carry it out ie: Say for
instance the only two parts left are Tom and Nagini, do you think
one or the other would want whats left or each others soul, so they
themself would live? Please let me know what you think on these 2
subjects....Expecto Patronum (Happy Thoughts to All!)