Is The Potter's Invisibility Cloak A Relic?

[Tonks]

No: HPFGUIDX 158369

I am not sure if the cloak is a relic of the founders. But what if 
it has some special power of its own. And James did not want it to 
fall into LV hands if he found the Potters.

I think the line of speculation need to go in the direction of 
keeping it out of LV hands for some reason rather then the use of 
the cloak for invisiability. 

I think we need to search the history of the human race for some 
epic story or ?? that involves a cloak and its meaning. I don't know 
where that will lead us, but I just think that is the direction to 
go.

Does the cloak give DD some special power that he does not have and 
he turns it over to Harry when Harry comes to Hogwarts for that 
reason, to transfer this power to Harry? If it were just protection 
I think James would have kept it. We do see the cloak a lot. So this 
can be a big clue to something right under our noses, as usual.

Tonks_op
totally confused.