Blood Protection/Dumbledore and Harry
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 20 23:44:31 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 158543
> Random832:
<SNIP>
> And it's not like he would have been completely undefended
elsewhere.
> You have to compare the blood protection to what protection he
would
> have received living with any of the others, _not_ to "no
protection
> at all".
>
> The blood protection is not perfect. It did not protect him from
> whatever "experience" it was that "taught him to stay well out of
> Vernon's reach". It did not protect him from being portkeyed away
and
> having his arm sliced open by the very man who condemned his
parents
> to death. It has not protected him from Voldemort personally at all
> since the end of fourth year. Surely he could be better protected
at
> Grimmauld Place once the blood protection was out of the equation.
>
Alla:
Yes, this quote also always frustrates me and makes me think that
blood protection is not perfect either. Basically what I am trying
to say is that IMO to place Harry with Dursleys was only worth it,
if blood protection is iron clad, IF nothing else would have worked
and if blood protection works 100%.
"For he has been better protected than I think even he knows,
protected in ways devised by Dumbledore long ago, when it fell to
him to arrange the boy's future. Dumbledore invoked an ancient
magic, to ensure the boy's protection as long as he is in his
relations' care. Not even I can touch him there. . . . Then, of
course, there was the Quidditch World Cup. ... I thought his
protection might be weaker there, away from his relations and
Dumbledore, but I was not yet strong enough to attempt kidnap in the
midst of a horde of Ministry wizards. And then, the boy would
return to Hogwarts, where he is under the crooked nose of that
Muggle-loving fool from morning until night. So how could I take
him? "
This is of course Voldemort bragging so we should take it with the
grain of salt, I suppose.
But what part are we supposed to take with grain of salt? The one
where he says that Harry was better protected than he even knows or
the part where he says that even he ( Voldemort) cannot touch Harry
there.
Am I supposed to read that Voldemort's minions indeed could touch
Harry there and only his highness himself cannot?
I mean, supposedly Voldemort does not understand ancient magic of
love but he understands at least on rational level that protection
against him worked?
Ugh, I so wish JKR would explain the mechanics of blood protection.
JMO,
Alla
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive