In defense of DD WAS musings on Dumbledore - Even Longer
juli17 at aol.com
juli17 at aol.com
Sun Sep 24 22:46:05 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 158720
Magpie wrote:
It's very important to the plot that Dumbledore have no interest in Sirius
because the slightest effort on his part to find out what happened would
have cleared everything up. JKR created a believable situation to make this
possible with Barty Crouch and Dumbledore's honest testimony about the
Secret Keeper. But given the DD that we've seen, the guy happy to explain
everyone's actions to us, it still requires him to suddenly become amazingly
uninterested in what went down in a situation very important to him. It's
like if it were Ron going to jail under the same circumstances after Harry's
death. It's not enough that Dumbledore can't get Sirius out of jail. He
has to be ready to convict him on circumstantial evidence like everyone
else.
-m
Julie:
Just to make it a clearer analogy, it would be like Ron going to jail after
Harry's death, with DD knowing that only a very *few* other people could
have betrayed Harry, those being, say, Hermione, Ginny, Neville, or
Luna. The only people Harry would have trusted implicitly enough to
be his secret-keeper (and, yes, Harry might have more people than
that, but it didn't seem James did). DD was told by Harry that Ron
is his secret-keeper. Ron is found soon after Harry's demise, laughing
maniacally over the dead body of Neville, and is carrying away in that
crazed state.
So, in this scenario, DD thinks...what?? Oh, Ron, dear friend of Harry
can't be guilty, it must be Hermione, dear friend of Harry, or Neville, dear
friend of Harry. Well, except that Neville is dead too. But still, Harry
Harry must have changed secret-keepers, suddenly and for no clear
reason, without telling anyone. All that evidence against Ron--that
very STRONG evidence--it must be wrong! It had to be one of the other
highly trusted friends!
Again, it's not like the culprit could be *anyone*. There is no way
it could be Umbridge, Fudge, Snape, Malfoy, or someone else who
has had a contentious relationship with Harry. It can only be one of
that small group of people, who are all supposedly intensely loyal
to Harry and the Order. One of *them* did it. The evidence is piled up
against one of them--Ron--and while it is circumstantial, it is very
strong and would get a conviction in pretty much any court in the
US or UK I'm sure. After all, Ron's only defense is his word that Harry
changed secret-keepers at the last minute to Neville, who just happens
to be dead now, and Ron was found standing over that dead body
laughing maniacally. What to think, what to think??
I do believe that DD should and probably did feel regret after the
events of POA, and wished he'd delved further into the matter way
back when Sirius was first thrown into Azkaban. But I just don't see
that he bears *blame* for not doing so, when nothing in the original
circumstances gave him reason to suspect there was a change in the
secret-keeper or to suspect one of James' other friends was so much
more likely a homicidal betrayer than Sirius. (I note also that the other
likely suspects--Peter and Lupin--were Order members too I believe,
so those asking why Dumbledore didn't "support" Sirius as he would
other Order members by questioning the situation further, should you
also being asking why Dumbledore would be suspecting another Order
member--you know, those folks he loves to support and protect--*was*
the culprit despite *no* evidence, rather than Sirius who was damned
by loads of evidence. Especially when one of those possible suspects
was presumably DEAD.)
Okay, I'll desist now. I'm not going to blame DD for Sirius's fate, not
even a little. I do wish he'd decided to talk to Sirius back then and
get his story, but I can understand that the evidence seemed to say
it all, and that DD had other critical issues to deal with at a time when
it didn't occur to him that there could reasonable (if highly unlikely)
doubt of Sirius's guilt. Regret that DD didn't make time to see Sirius,
yes (as I'm sure DD does), but blame him, no.
Julie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive