Inconsistencies (Was: Hermione's parents)
Katie
anigrrrl2 at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 3 17:39:56 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 174396
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "sylviampj" <autr61 at ...> wrote:
<<<SNIP>>>
> Once again I ask - why is it *our* responsibility as readers to
> make up excuses and explanations for all the stuff the author
>didn't bother to make clear or just plain forgot about?
va32h..
<<SNIP>>
Sylvia:
>
> Did Ron have two careers? Or is JKR making it up as she goes along?
>
> Sylvia.
>
****
Katie:
LOL! I think it's a little of both. It's funny, the more I dig into
DH, the good parts keep getting better and the bad parts keep getting
worse. Overall, I like the book very much, and there are some
extraordinary parts...but wow, plot holes.
I never really noticed too much before this book...and I think that's
because the plot holes before were not integral to the plot. This
time they were.
Last night, two of my best HP pals and I went out for a beer and a HP
chat. One thing we kept discussing was that if disarming someone was
enough to gain control of their wand...then no one in the Dueling
Club or the D.A. owned their own wand anymore! Yet, as I understand it
(and maybe I don't :) )Draco disarming DD made him the owner of the
Elder Wand? Is that right? If that IS the claim in DH, then she;'s
got some explaining to do about all those "Expelliarus!" cries
throughout the series. Of course, it's very possible I am very
confused...because that whole wand thing was crazy!
I still love the series and I still think JKR is generally a very
talented storyteller, but something went kind of wonky in this book
and I think it was editors too intimidated by her being her to tell
her some stuff sucked, or didn't make sense.
Anyway, any insight on the wand thing? Thanks! Katie
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive