A Sense of Betrayal
sylviampj
autr61 at dsl.pipex.com
Fri Aug 3 21:19:12 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 174416
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Lee Kaiwen <leekaiwen at ...>
wrote:
>
> horridporrid03 blessed us with this gem On 25/07/2007 09:27:
> >
> > Betsy Hp:
> > Oh my gosh, I totally agree. We heard not hair nor hide about the
> > Hallows in any of the previous books and suddenly JKR decides
that
> > what this great McGuffin hunt needs is... three more McGuffins.
The
> > hell?
>
> Yeah, didn't make much sense in that way. At the end of HBP
Dumbledore
> entrusts Harry with the sacred task of destroying Horcruxes, only
to
> suddenly start lobbing excruciating hints of Deathly Hallows at
Harry
> out of left field just to -- what? -- demonstrate some sort of
sadistic
> streak? Harry rationalization was that maybe there were things he
was
> supposed to learn, but not use. Come again? Smack in the middle of
the
> Great Horcrux Chase hardly seems the proper time for Dumbledore to
be
> distracting Harry with trivia lesson.
>
> I think what JKR was going for was the Revelation, a "Wow --
Harry's
> Invisibility Cloak is is a Deathly Hallow? That's so-o-o KEWL!"
kind of
> moment. In the end, however, the cost in terms of story line was
just
> too high.
>
> CJ>>>
I'm sure that JKR is telling the truth when she says that she
planned the whole series from the beginning. I'm also pretty sure
that the evolution in the scope and tone of the books was a response
to the huge and unexpected public reaction to them. JKR started out
writing delightful children's stories, with which like all good
children's stories are popular with adults who like to escape into a
fantasy world. But she ended up trying to write an epic, a
whodunnit, a coming of age story, an allegory... And she
overstretched herself. Some of the facile divisions between good
guys and bad guys and the static characterisations which were
adequate for the first three books were unsustainable for the
remaining four and I think limited her ability to develop her
characters and the storyline. I don't feel betrayed. I enjoyed the
books very much and I think JKR gave it her best shot. But I think
she boxed herself in from the beginning into a children's story
format and never really managed to break out of it.
She also boxed herself in with a seven book format. I think five or
at most six books would have been enough. I personally believe that
the 'Deathly Hallow's were an add-on. It was all about the Horcruxes
but then JKR realised that she had to sustain the interest of her
audiences for a seventh book and she introduced this new element
which was supposed to test Harry's mettle in a new way. IMO the
question of Harry's purity of motives and heart was settled in PS
when he was able to take the Philosopher's stone because he did not
want to use it for personal gain. Time after time in the books he
faced death bravely or rejected limelight or popularity in favour of
the truth. We didn't need the Deathly Hallows to tell us this.
Sylvia.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive