On Dumbledore, Snape and Horcrux-Harry
two_flower2
two_flower2 at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 4 19:36:22 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 174486
Having read DH, I was horrified at what seemed to me Dumbledore's
ruthless and heartless conduct: to raise child in order to manipulate
him into sacrificing himself seemed despicable to me.
I could not understand why Snape went along with Dumbledore's plans
even after having learned that Harry, whom Snape had strived to
protect for so many years, was to be "slaughtered like a pig".
But suddenly it dawned on me that Dumbledore never
soughtto "sacrifice" Harry. On the contrary, he desperately tried to
save him from "a fate more horrible than death". All the
Machiavellian plans might not have been for the greater good at all.
It might have been all about Harry. Dumbledore knew that being a
Horcrux, Harry was tethered to life along with Voldemort. It means,
that Harry was OMG immortal in the same nasty way Voldemort was.
While a bit of Voldie's soul was in Harry's, Harry could neither live
happily, nor die normally. And what if somebody had killed off
Voldie and sent his disembodied spirit to an unknown destination for
a hundred years? What would have happened to Harry in that case? It
was crucial for D-dore to make Harry try and get murdered by Voldie
ASAP, in Harry's own best interests. It was not even death
Dumbledore tried to save Harry from, it was an eternity of cursed
existence or something like that. Poor Dumbledore and Snape. How
desperate they must have been. I think that when D-dore stopped
being teary over Snape's patronus, he explained to Snape that they
were STILL protecting Lily's son and in the circs it would be a mercy
for the boy to actually die, and their task would be to manipulate
events so that Harry would get a chance to sacrifice himself, and
then, if lucky, Harry might not have to die after all due to Lily's
protection.
Not that their actual plan--for Snape to explain Harry about
Harrycrux when the right moment came--wasn't silly. Snape was in a
constant danger to be killed by minion-murdering Voldie on a whim
before he had a chance to talk to Harry and that's what almost
happened.
Anyway, Dumbledore is not THAT Machiavellian as he seems, IMO
Twoflower2, a lurker
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive