[HPforGrownups] Umbridge Under the Influence: Dolores and the Locket
IreneMikhlin
irene_mikhlin at btopenworld.com
Tue Aug 7 22:34:54 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 174744
I thought the whole "wearing horcux interferes with your patronus"
business is a giant plot hole. I mean, Harry was able to produce perfect
Patronuses for four and a half books, while all this time he was
carrying a horcrux inside his head. So how come the external locket was
so much more influential?
Irene
Ceridwen wrote:
> What effect did the locket horcrux have on Dolores Umbridge? She was
> the most horrible character invented in the series, so it's hard for me
> to see any difference between the High Inquisitor of Hogwarts in OotP,
> and the High Inquisitor of Muggles in DH. She's still a rotten...
> person.
>
> We know the locket exacted a toll on the trio when each of them wore
> it. Tempers flared, spirits were depressed, and Ron's concerns seemed
> to have been magnified - shown in detail in the sequence where
> he 'kills' the horcrux.
>
> What was its effect on Umbridge? Did its influence weaken her
> Patronus? Did it make her even eviller than she was? Did it in any
> way influence her to retrieve Mad-Eye Moody's eye when he was killed?
>
> At which point in the book, or the last three books, did she get this
> Horcrux? How long has it been affecting her?
>
> Ceridwen.
>
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive